We don't have to have car insurance. Or, is mandatory medical liability insurance next?

G

gws17

New member
Contrary to what liberals have been blurting out in defense of Obama's latest astonishing comments about mandatory health care, we are not required to buy car insurance to cover damage to our own vehicles and property, or to cover our own injuries.

We are required only to buy liability insurance to cover damage we might cause to other persons' vehicles and property, and to cover injuries we might cause to others.

So does this mean now we will be forced to buy medical liability insurance, in case we get a communicable illness and we pass it on to others, then we have to pay for their medical care if they blame their own sickness on us?

If Ted Kennedy was still around, I'd say yes.

But now that Kennedy died, Obama has lost his ride.

Does anybody seriously believe that mandatory medical liability insurance is anywhere on our political horizon? I didn't think so.

So why does anybody think there's any valid comparison between being required to protect others from our actions while driving our cars, an being required to protect ourselves from our own medical expenses?

Or, are plain facts and logic irrelevant to liberal rhetoric? I thought so.
Greentad, I live in one of those states and you are lying.
Mr. Danger, you are correct that is exactly the current law.

So how does anybody possibly say the current law is 'the same as" requiring us to insure ourselves, when it currently does no such thing?

Do plain facts and logic have any relevance to liberal rhetoric? Apparently not.
 
I have paid for mine own ins. for years. Why in the xell should I pay for anyone else's. Obamaxx had said that he wanted ins. to be competitive. Now he wants to tax public ins. Where is the competitiveness? @#>@#>@#>@@@>###

He said our Constitution is flawed. Didn't he take an oath to defend and uphold our Constitution? The majority is getting very very very pissed now. Their trying to force us into a dictatorship.

They're infringing on our Constitutional Rights now and things aren't looking well. They try to forget how Americans pulled together when threatened.

Revolution is coming! American people aren't going to put up with their socialism.
 
Auto insurance is required as part of owning a vehicle...If you choose not to own a vehicle because you can't afford maintenance, gas, insurance, or whatever, you don't have to pay for auto insurance.

With health insurance, there will be absolutely NO choice, we all have bodies

So, no...There is no comparison

I disagree with the government forcing me to do ANYTHING, and I am very satisfied with the way I have been providing health care for my family for 20 years now...I don't appreciate having my family's health care decisions taking away from me by the government
 
If you don't own a car or drive your vehicle only on your private property you do not have to have insurance either.
 
Let me get this right
You're driving in your car and you crunch into a highway underpass at high speed
While you do have basic liability insurance on your vehicle , you have no personal medical insurance for yourself
Who pays for your multiple injuries ?
[ cue Jeopardy music]
The American taxpayer does..We don't have to But we do
 
Actually you bring up a good point in favor of mandatory health insurance, why if that was in place, should anyone have to pay any auto insurance to cover any medical care caused by an auto accident?
 
Actually, you are dead wrong. Many states require PIP coverage (no fault).
The following states require PIP coverage: Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Utah and Texas.

It is possible and works quite well.
 
Back
Top