Voyager vs. Q9c vs. Ozone

A

A Cluster of Pixels

New member
I am going to use Page Plus 1200 TnT and narrowed my phone choices to LG Voyager, Motorola Q9c and HTC Ozone. Below is the following what I would mainly want the phone for:
1) Calls
2) Texting - Some SMS texting but mostly MMS pictures of son to family is the most important.
3) Checking yahoo email account - Not a necessity
4) Some data usage which will probably increase as I get use to.
5) WiFi is nice but not necessary because I have an iPod Touch and use constantly with WiFi.
What phone do you believe is the best for what I am looking for also how easy are the phones to get to work Talk, Text and Data if purchased on ebay.
Can get Q9c for $95 + ship and is guaranteed to have all work.
Any information is appreciated.
 
My order of preference would be Ozone, Q9c, and Voyager... The Voyager is a WAP phone and as such a little more limited in its data flexibility and not as "out of the box". It also doesn't have WiFi. While both Ozone and Q9c are smartphones, the Ozone is a little more up to date. It has built in Wifi and a 2M camera. With the Q9c you could add a wifi card but I'm betting the battery life would really stink(even worse than normal for a smartphone). Also the camera in the q9c is only a 1.3.

Not to add to your choices but you may also want to look at the Samsung Omnia i910 if you are going to want to send pic messages as it has a 5M camera and wifi as well as a lot of apps/mods if you ever start using data even more. HTH
 
Back
Top