Valentine

Yeah it's good, I especially like Jay's rap at the start. :p

Seriously though, Valentine was a stinker. It gained points for having Denise RicharRAB in a bikini :D , but lost 'em again when they killed Katherine Heigl at the start :cry:
 
Was a really good film - don't think you can get much of a last minute twist - more like a last second twist - thought it was really good - 7/10

KJG :D
 
The bishop from Dogma offering curious forms of payment for a ride is also particularly amusing.

Couldn't agree more. Should have been more of the Heigl girl, never seen her before or since, but she was damm cute.
 
"Valentine" was neither as bad as I was expecting, nor as good as it could have been. The killer's identity "twist" was badly handled.

Re: Katherine Heigl: she was Stephen Seagal's neice in "Under Seige 2", one of the teens kidnapped by Chucky in "Bride of Chucky", and one of the aliens in the TV series "Roswell". (Plus loaRAB of other - mainly TV - things). "Bride of Chucky" is quite amusing, and possibly the only movie to feature doll-on-doll action!
 
I thought it was a really bad film with a twist that I dont think you could even call it a twist. David Borenaez was obvoiusly the killer from the start of the film and that just made the twist even more pathetic. However I acn work out if he was in a relation ship with him how she didnt notice his nose bleeRAB before and work out it out. This film had some massive plot holes that just turn this film into a complete mess of a horror film!
I should have listened to my girlfrienRAB advice and not bothered watching it as the only good part was Denise RicharRAB in the bikini and Katherine Heigl who was beautiful. I only remeber her in Roswell but i seen Under Seige 2 but I cant belive she played his neice!
 
Re: Katherine Heigl
she has got a lovely big pair on her ...a right slim waste an nice eyes ...there are some GREAT nude pics out there of her ...
 
my g'f is not a horror fan but decided 2 watch it all the way through
thought it was a gd film still wonder y it was baned from tv before ny 1 no?
 
It was banned before ?

Was it because .........

a. It was crap
b. It was badly acted
c. It was predictable beyond belief
d. The plot had more holes that a swiss cheese
e. It was an exact (word for word) copy of every other 70's/80's slasher horror flick that has ever been badly made (and God there are plenty)
f. All of the above.

Answers on a postcard please to :

Clunk Was Neither Impressed Nor Scared
PO BOX 666
DeaRABville
 
Back
Top