i think chalice disagrees with compulsory DNA testing for non criminals.
I understand that but I don't understand how it is asking anyone to disprove anything.
i think chalice disagrees with compulsory DNA testing for non criminals.
How is it asking you to prove that. I can't even begin to understand that argument.
I understand that but I don't understand how it is asking anyone to disprove anything.
explain what you don't understand again? I'm slightly lost.
For one thing, errors occur in labs.
Just as innocent men have been hung in jails, mistakes will be made in DNA analyses. Human error will win out.
I agree, I think "Lab errors" could be used as an excuse by the police when they want to convict an innocent person using DNA tests. that doesnt make much sense though.For one thing, errors occur in labs.
I agree, I think "Lab errors" could be used as an excuse by the police when they want to convict an innocent person using DNA tests. that doesnt make much sense though.![]()
I agree, I think "Lab errors" could be used as an excuse by the police when they want to convict an innocent person using DNA tests. that doesnt make much sense though.![]()