smash5212 P
New member
There's been some, (actually a lot) of discussion about how PPCs are so much better than Palms. One user said that the hardware was a whole lot more advanced. This is simply not true. Most PPC devices have around 400mhz processors, and they're not even the new multimedia Intel XScale processor that's in the T5. With the exception of the Dell Axim which has the 613?mhz XScale processor. Palm has great multimedia capabilities, hi-res screens, AND I must add, the T5 has that 256 Flash memory. That's something PPCs don't have. Then with PPCs you have to worry about "swap" space (for lack of a better term). Palm's don't have that issue unless you're running things off the card or internal Flash, which most users do. Then they simply store most everything on the card and leave the RAM open for launching programs.
Palms have Bluetooth, meaning lots of compatability with cell phones and other Palm devices. With the exception of the Tungsten C, there's not one with Wi-Fi. That much is true, but Palm has the W-Fi card for the T3 and the driver will soon be compatable with the T5. Not a bad deal, especially when you think about the fact that the T5 has that 256MB of memory. Not bad at all.
PPC is maintained/created by Microsoft. Msft has big bucks to put into their operating systems, yet in order to get the same performance on a PPC that you get with a Palm, you have to have a faster processor. Why? Because Microsoft think that everything has to look like it comes from 2030 and have really big visual themes. I've just never been impressed with PPCs that much.
Something I heard once that I liked: "Windows is for Laptops, Palm for handhelds. Any questions?"
Bring the discussion everybody!
(But keep it calm)
Palms have Bluetooth, meaning lots of compatability with cell phones and other Palm devices. With the exception of the Tungsten C, there's not one with Wi-Fi. That much is true, but Palm has the W-Fi card for the T3 and the driver will soon be compatable with the T5. Not a bad deal, especially when you think about the fact that the T5 has that 256MB of memory. Not bad at all.
PPC is maintained/created by Microsoft. Msft has big bucks to put into their operating systems, yet in order to get the same performance on a PPC that you get with a Palm, you have to have a faster processor. Why? Because Microsoft think that everything has to look like it comes from 2030 and have really big visual themes. I've just never been impressed with PPCs that much.
Something I heard once that I liked: "Windows is for Laptops, Palm for handhelds. Any questions?"
Bring the discussion everybody!
(But keep it calm)
