Toon Zone Talkback - "Caillou's Family Favorites:" When Edutainment is All Edu- and No -Tainment

freeze_sr

New member
This is the talkback thread for "Caillou's Family Favorites:" When Edutainment is All Edu- and No -Tainment.
splash-forkids-lg-tp.jpg


Did you know Marc Brown's Arthur is edu-tainment too?
 
It's all education and no entertainment,huh?

Sorry,but isn't most preschool shows unless it's aimed at preschoolers.

Why would we find them entertaining?But...I do have a soft spot for Blues Clues. :p
 
Sesame Street managed to be both it pretty well. Even something like Mr. Rogers had enough not to bore the supervising adults.



French-Canadian. And, if you really wanted to know, it's pronounced "kai-ooo."

-- Ed
 
Amen to that. I find Mr. Rogers and Sesame Street the founding fathers of edu-tainment. I never found Fred Rogers, even with his extremely laid back demeanor boring. He was like a kindly uncle that came in and told you stories, and let you meet his friends. And Sesame, well, that was a pretty amazing product. Even with the ultra toned down Elmo-centricities of the show, it's still an amazing product.

I actually saw an episode of this years back, and found it dull and somewhat annoying. Most of the characters on the show sounded like Adam Sandler impersonations to me (At least the puppet Turtle thing).

From what I remember, there are muscial numbers, but they're mainly chapter breaks inbetween the shorts. Maybe they didn't include them on this release. But trust me, they were BAD. Very bland muscial numbers. I saw them all the time, flipping past PBS on many a saturday morning.

I agree with the review. it's not a bad show, but it doesn't do too much to become a good show either. Now Arthur, that's a show. I'm disapoointed it came out 10 years too late for me.
 
Your missing the point. Basically what the article says is that it focuses more on educational value and less on entertainment value...something that has happened more than once actually (long story).
 
I have to say, I agree. I tried watching it a few mornings, and it was painful. Now I know it's aimed at a particular age set, but seriously-- Curious George was 10 times more entertaining.

Mr. Rogers and Sesame Street are still as entertaining to me as they were when I first saw them. I don't really know why--- they have a ton of charm to them and even though the Sesame Street muppets are puppets-- we still look at them almost like they were people.
 
And he sounds like Adam Sandler as the Waterboy too.:narf:

I agree that it isn't so much a bad show as not good enough. But at least it isn't quite as patronizing as Super Why. And do not get me started on Teletubbies. AS Roger Ramjet once said, "Probably revenge for the Boston Tea Party!"
 
Back
Top