Tomorrow I will be debating an evolutionist. (I am a creationist). Now I have

N

Nick

New member
studied evolution enough to? disprove it. But my opponent wants me to ask random people 3 facts that destroy evolution. If you are a evolutionist don't bother answering.
 
First off the term evolutionist is ignorant because it implies that there is even the tiniest chance it is incorrect.

Evolution is a fact as much as it is a fact that you breath air. Natural selection as the method doesn't quite reach that level.

Anybody that gives you a fact that destroys evolution is ignorant beyond being silly and ridiculous.

This is a science section. If you want mythological answers, there is a religion and spirituality section.
 
So, you're basically asking if your argument is sufficiently EVOLVED?
Interesting, if ironic, choice of process. Does it continue to the possibility there are 3 facts that would destroy your (evolved) argument?
 
Back
Top