To fellow Ron Paul supporters, what annoy's you most about debating with

M

Mike

New member
statist's online? These are people that support Obama/Clinton or support Bush/Romney/McCain/Huckabee. You would think they were a Washington insider the way they speak even if they are not. They support the IRS, Federal Reserve, Universal Health Care, ATF, etc.

Which debate tatic annoy's you the most?

A) They play dumb

B) They try to get the last word in

C) They advocate the State using violence against you becuase you support getting rid of the IRS or drug war

D) They repeat the same arguments over again

E) Other-explain
 
all of the above

E) when their side is in power they think they have the moral high ground but oppose it when the other side does the same-hypocrites

F) the line "why waste a vote on a third party? might as well pick the lesser of two evils."

G) calling anything you don't like a crack pot conspiracy
 
they have no idea what the term "Liberty" actually means....and they are completely naive to what the declaration actually stands for.

(I usually win the debate when I ask someone to explain in detail how our monetary policy functions..You would think they would know, cause they understand the recession is over now...LOL)
 
As few votes that he got in the primaries, you Ron Paul supporters must be overwhelmed by the percent of minority you are in. Obviously the vast majority of Americans think he and his ideas are irrelevant. I won't even bother to argue about his goofy assed ideas.
 
E.

Rather than think for themselves, they shoot the same rhetoric that's blasted over 99% of talk radio to justify the violence that our government commits.
As if we haven't already heard ALL of those talking points 20 times before :-P

Most of the time, we can think for ourselves and actually have good retorts to each of the talking points, but then comes A (Playing dumb) and B.. (Last word in the form of more talking points)

I don't even argue anymore. Learned that a long time ago.
A person convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
A better method, in my opinion is to agree where you can, and use logic to let them lead themselves to the ideas of liberty.
If you get them thinking for themselves, Liberty is only a natural conclusion.
 
The underlying basic problem is that they think the only answer to any problem is for the government to take care of it. They will accept nothing else. To them the free market has failed but that isn't really the case. It has just been interfered with so badly that it isn't allowed to work anymore. For example, selling health insurance across state lines might work out very well but they will have nothing to do with it. If we would get out of the UN we could have our country back.
 
Well, I cant really answer that but I can say that as a NON Ron Paul supporter....

Sustain government with
No taxes
No federal reserve
No national defense
No roads
No irs
No atf
No health care

Seems like Iran to me, maybe Somalia.

Ron Paul in my stong opinion is an IDIOT and that is why RON PAUL GETS NO VOTES IN A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Think about that for awhile as you drive your gas guzzling suv filled up by our federal governments system of regulating gas gouging and drive on the federally built road or you could do it Ron Pauls way and get that wagon out and some horses and drive thru the Praire with your guns and lawlessness and take your chances on survival...

Really, think about that. You guys demonize the very things you gourge yourselves on. That to me is hypocritical.

So, if I were a Ron Paul supporter I would say OTHER

Lets change our ideas, for the ones we have really stink.
 
C. - on both sides, they tend to want to empower the federal govt,, which I hate.

To the haters, Ron Paul is more intelligent than you could ever dream of being.
 
Back
Top