I don't really care, to be honest. It's more of a problem to have it in the pledge, but even that's just kind of tradition no one really pays attention to.
I mean, the Finnish have a state religion, but they're notoriously a progressive and atheistic society-- the presence of god reminds me of modern monarchy, and it's fine when no one takes it seriously.
--
EDIT: I'm well aware of that, and while I don't love the idea of a McCarthy stain on our currency or pledge, it's still not a big deal. Removing it isn't going to change anything-- if nothing else, it's only going to give Christians more of a persecution complex. And yes, even in that short of a time, it's become an American "tradition." Even 50 years is like, 1/4-1/5 of our entire history.
---
Um, my argument isn't "the" tradition argument, if you'd bother actually reading what I wrote.
I was saying being a "tradition" makes it pointless, not immune. It's become mindless, and has little real "religious" significance to anyone-- which is why I compared it to modern monarchy, and not some great and meaningful tradition which must not be touched. Monarchy is a dangerous thing, but when it's sitting harmlessly as a figurehead in Buckingham palace, who cares?
Obviously slavery wasn't a tradition in the sense that it was an obsolete figurehead type and not hurting anyone, so there's no point idiotically comparing that to what I said.
I'm also not arguing to keep religion on money, I'm saying it's not particularly problematic, and if we were picking our battles, I wouldn't pick this one.