H
Hayek=Win
Guest
What, you'd rather help welfare-dependents than working and middle class people with the very real problem of affordable healthcare?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
H
Hayek=Win
Guest
Then you could keep choosing your own doctor, while covering the population more effectively than would Obamacare.
It could be funded to tax-neutrality by absorbing Medicare/medicaid, and abolishing welfare/foodstamps/project housing subsidies.
This would benefit all working people and those who would like to see fewer government programs since it would get rid of a good number of entitlement programs. The only losers would be the health insurance companies and the non-productive lumpenproletariat who live on government handouts.
Anyone actually disagree?
It could be funded to tax-neutrality by absorbing Medicare/medicaid, and abolishing welfare/foodstamps/project housing subsidies.
This would benefit all working people and those who would like to see fewer government programs since it would get rid of a good number of entitlement programs. The only losers would be the health insurance companies and the non-productive lumpenproletariat who live on government handouts.
Anyone actually disagree?
T
TankRizzo
Guest
Maybe this would work in your mickey mouse, pseudo communist-democracy in Russia, but that shit won't fly here.
I
inh
Guest
shut up fag
E
EdgeOfSanity
Guest
Our government is too incompetent to run any sort of universal healthcare. So i disagree.
D
dmora
Guest
i like the cut of your jib, sailor!
H
Hayek=Win
Guest
To prove who is strongest.