The Prestige's Prestigious films to immerse you

  • Thread starter Thread starter mark f
  • Start date Start date
M

mark f

Guest
Gay is a pejorative when you're trying to reach a seemingly-imposible consensus? I don't really care. That makes as much sense as saying that if we like old B&W films, we're racists. At least, my wife and daughter won't accuse me of being gay, but you know what?, I know you're not serious, but even if you are, go ahead and tell Brenda and Sarah that I'm gay. I dare you! Even if you did, I wouldn't take it as an insult, but you will still be read the riot act, if only because you want to be funny. Hell, I thought it was funny too. Now, Group Hug, you Hugaphobic!
 
Yeah guys, Nil By Mouth will definitely stun you. Y'know, when you say that Casino may have a slight edge over Goodfellas, you forced me to think and compare the films more than I would have liked. I think Casino has the better flow but that Goodfellas is just way too funny and has more stand out scenes. Tough choice though.
 
"anndd....why so serious?"

27. The Terminator (James Cameron, 1984)



With it's brilliant high concept and barrel scraping scraping budget, Terminator had 'classic B movie' written all over it. It's a fascinating tech noir that dares to comment on societies fear towards the advancement of technology. This was officially the start of Cameron's recurring theme of man and machine. Not that it's commentary gets in the way of the pacing and action. Oh no. It just serves to compliment it. And it gives the feeling that we're spectating a film that's as intelligent as it is action packed.

Speakin' of which, Cameron handles these action set pieces terrifically and revels in the relentlessness of the violence that gave such films as Mad Max and Assault On Precint 13 their cult status.

I love this film because of the sense of urgency in virtually all the scenes. It generates full excitement from the very first frame, and features one of my favourite endings to a film ever. "You're terminated ****er!"



The final sequences are both heart breaking and scary. When my boy Kyle Reese is killed, we fear for Sarah Conner even more than we did in the beginning because up until the latter scene, she had appeared very hesitant, unbelieving and helpless. So when she's left to fend for herself, we really feel for her. The hell she is put through coupled with her inner tenacity is what makes Sarah Conner as big an icon as the T-800 model.

The Sarah Conner character is an early indication that Jimbo Cameron is as much interested in female characters as he is with male macho types. More so in fact. He has done a lot for females in cinema, and has always shown them to be be strong, capable human beings. And since this is the last James Cameron film to appear on my list, I would like to talk about him for a bit.



Just like Kanye West, James Cameron was a college drop out. It wasn't until the tenacious Canadian enrolled at Roger Corman's New World company that he honed his figted technical skills. After graduation, the tough as Irish leather Canadian ended up helming Piranha 2: Flying Killers - a film that won't exactly go down alongside Unforgiven as one of the greatest films of all time.

When Cameron pitched The Terminator to studio bosses, he realised he was a mother ****er trying to ice skate up hill . The 80s studio bosses were hardly the most compromising bunch, so he got original choice, Lance Henriksen, to play the indestructible cybernetic organism in a meeting with said bosses. Needless to say, they were all convinced that this near perfect premise could be realised. And realised it was.





And what of The Governator? Well, this is arguably Arnie's strongest performance in a motion picture. Cameron smartly uses his lack of acting experience to deliver a performance devoid of emotion. Arnie's powerful looking jawline suggests a cold, abstract and steely internal existence. And it is. James Cameron's greatest film ever.



26. LA Confidential (Curtis Hanson, 1997)



A critically acclaimed film that more than lives up to it's merits, LA Confidential 's reputation has grown to the point where it is now considered one of the most vital films of the 90's. In that sense, it's journey to worldwide mass acclaim parallels Frank Darabont's Shawshank Redemption growing respect. Both were box office failures and both had to wait until they debuted on the VHS format to find their true audience.

Kudos then to Mr. Hanson (mmmbop) for delivering a masterful work of art despite James ****in' Ellroy's complex novel. It's a powerhouse achievement in cinema, and until 2000, was the best neo-noir in years.



In my opinion, and i'm fully prepared for the flaming, it's a LOT better than Chinatown as a 50's set noir mystery thriller. I know that Chinatown is beloved 99.9% of MoFo, but I feel that it lacks the emotional punch it seemingly set out to have. The reveal lacks weight and I honestly don't like the photography. At all. However, Hanson's crime art is full of some surprisingly emotional scenes and encompasses everything sleazy about the crime world: Gangland violence, authroitarian brutality, and institutionalised racism. It's the ugly side of life and it's delivered in narrative that's as slick 'n' stylish as anything Scorsese or DePalma has ever done.



Adding to the brilliant screenplay, the protagonists are all very distinctive in their personalities. Kevin Spacey's cynical show-off Jack Vincennes; Guy Pearce's (stand out) uber straight and snitchy Ed Exley' And of course, Russell Crowe's brawny, tough and anti-domestic violent Bud White. Hanson does an extroadanairy job in contrasting these lawmen's approaches to police procedure, justice and the opposite sex. It's not until the film's reveal that the character's have a moment of introspection and take a stand against the corruption that they've ignored around them.

Pearce's performance towards the end is quite astonishing and one can tell from this performance why Christopher Nolan picked him to star in Memento. His performance is nothing short of subtle, shocking, compelling and immensely assured. But then, those are the exact words that encapsulate what Confidential is all about.



Like the tagline explicitly states, this is a world where nothing is what it seems. Just when you think that Bud White is the defender of all woman, WHAM, he goes and commits the opposite of his noble beliefs. Just when you think that Ed Exley is a snivelling weasal, he displays an uncharacteristic capacity for violence. It's these character swerves that really define Confidential for me. It's what makes it one of the most exciting noirs in cinema history. It's one of the few thrillers that never undermine the value of human cost, and is brutally honest about police corruption.



Speaking of which, the central mystery is, in classic noir fashion, an obstacle of intentionally misleading ruses. One that always keeps the audience guessing. However, the plot never feels contrived and the characterisation is never tuucked away in favour of violence. And that's another reason why this film is number 26, theres no excess in any filmmaking aspect. It's all in proportion, like a gymnastics olympian. Everything just flows, and maybe this should be even higher.



25. A Room For Romeo Brass (Shane Meadows, 1999)



And here we are with the first Shane Meadows film to appear on my list - and at a VERY high ranking too. Just so you all know, this is not a mistake because this film is so risky, so complex that i'm surprised Meadows got the financing for it. It's probably not very popular amongst those outside of Britain so here is a quick synopsis:



Two school buddies, Romeo and Gain, are befriended by a weird yet endearingly funny individual called Morell (an OUTSTANDING Paddy Considine) after he saves them from a battering from a gang of school bullies. But it soon emerges that nothing is what it seems..


The first thing you'll notice about Romeo Brass is it's authentic depiction of British working class life and the unpretentiousness of it's narrative. It's got no allegories and pertains to a naturalistic, textbook camera style. In that sense, it is reminiscent of a Mike Leigh picture only without the boring and mundane dire-logue. This is another reason why this excellent film stands so high; the dialogue is (most of which is improvised) is sharp, witty banter that doesn't go out of it's way to sound like sharp and witty banter, unlike Diablo Cody's Juno screenplay. It feels real and flows perfectly,



But the best thing about this awesome coming-of-age drama is it's radical shift in tone. If you thought that Robert Rodriguez' From Dusk Till Dawn was the best exercise in sudden shifts of tone in the same film, then prepare to be amazed with Romeo Brass. I will not reveal too muchin the hope that you all purchase this little seen gem, but I will say that when you do finally watch it, make sure you enjoy as much of the film's beginning as possible. Enjoy Meadows' light hearted study of adolescent friendship while you can, because it does turn into a shocking drama. But yeah, I won't say anymore on the narrative and stop right here.



Actually, I won't stop there. Don't worry I won't spoil the story, but I really want to take a chance to mention Paddy Considine's performance.



His performance is too good for words. It's so hard to believe that this was his first ever role in a feature film because he seems to completely lose himself in the Morell character. He is at all times eccentric, beguiling, sad, halirious, scary and unhinged.

In fact, I kind of see similarities between Morell and Heath Ledger's The Joker. Just the way that they both use theatricality to express themselves.I mean, both have this ****ed-up indescribable accent and both literally come out of nowhere in their respective narratives. Like The Joker, Morell is presented as absolute and you're never quite sure if the things he says are true. All in all, it's an iconic performance from Considine and I wouldn't be surprised if Heath saw this film and got a little bit of inspiration from the Morell character..

24. Trainspotting (Danny Boyle, 1996)




It wasn't until around 2004 wheen I first watched Danny Boyle's revolutionary British film. I was doing a module where Trainspotting was a featured topic, so I went and watched it on DVD and was immediately entranced by Boyle's visionary direction and flair for creating exciting, colourful characters.

From it's inspired opening sequence, Trainspotting lets you know what you're in for and never lets up with it's impeccable pacing and stylish and disturbing imagery.



A lot of detractors of this film have critised it for 'glorifying drugs'. I don't think it does. If Trainspotting glorifies anything it's youthfulness. It can be argued that it glorifies the freedoms that we have while we're young and basically takes a distorted look into youth's answers to problem solving. It's funny because I have found that depending on if you watch it with friends or not, Trainspotting commands a very different response. When I watched it by myself, I found most of it really disturbing and tragic, whereas when I watched it with some mates, it was the most halirious thing I ever watched! I'm not sure why that is



I would like to think that Boyle intended me to react the way I did the first time round, which would eradicate any notion that Trainspotting glorifies drugs and druggies. That is not to say that the Trainspotting experience is purely a lecture about the pitfulls of heroin - no way. It's more of an examination of the realities of inner city life, yet it's done in such an entertaining manner that you really would have to sit down properly to fully understand the themes. It's got a crime caper thing going on to ensure maximum entertainment, but it never loses sight of what it's doing.

Along with the iconic portrayal of Rention by the ever likeable Ewan McGregor, Trainspotting features some flamboyant characters that are unrivalled when it comes to character quirks. Guys called Spud, Sick Boy, Begbie?!
All are fellow heroin users and all loveable rogues. 'Specially Robert Carlyle's Begbie, a psychotic moustache twirling madman with a talent for pool sticks.



Yeah, but as I said earlier, this is iconic British cinema and celebrates youthfullness by amplifying the profanity, catastrophic seual encounters and random bursts of violence. Do yourself a favour - choose life, choose TRAINSPOTTING.
 
Big Adventure is a killer Hitchcock flick where Pee-Wee plays the femme fatale with dyed hair!
 
You're twisting it and you're coming across as silly for doing so. I get that you are gay. I do get it. But purposefully misconstruing my text does nothing for your argument.

I said that reading the film as a 'gay love story' is superficial. Flippin' heck, man.
 
Yeah, and it's more than interesting, luv. It proper makes you think and everything. I would go as far as to say it has one of the most intriguing and exciting premises for a film. It just made me think that Cobb is actually right; Everything we own, all our belongings goes some way into defining us and telling us about ourselves. There has been talk of an American remake for quite sometime now. I'm not entirely against it, and it would be interesting to see what a bigger budget could do for the film, but as is usually the case, the original is often the best
 
Of course Brokeback Mountain is more than just a love story, just as Romeo and Juliet is more than just a love story...but both of these are love stories first and foremost and I don't think that makes them in any way 'superficial' or 'simple'. I don't think this makes the film "read like some sort of liberal gay right's campaign." anymore than Romeo and Juliet or, say, In the Mood for Love or Pretty Woman are hetero rights campaigns...

But nice to see this included in your list, I wish I'd put it higher in my own top 100 as I have come to appreciate it more since my first viewing (although not because I discovered hitherto unnoticed layers of heterosexual male companionship, but who knows, I'll look put for it next time it's on filmfour )
 
What is your reason for calling Pyro homophobic, Adidass? Is it just because he hasn't gotten round to watching Brokeback Mountain? If that's the case then it's safe to say that youassume way too much about people you don't even know. And it's piss poor to do such a thing, specially when theres not really any reason to.

Now, Mark F. Interesting post, mate. Yeah, I do agree with your statement about Lee's recurring theme of forbidden love. And yes, homosexuality is clearly a theme in Brokeback Mountain. I never once disputed that. My previous comments on the film was highlighting the deeper context of it all. That's how I see the film and that's how I always am always going to see it.

The film is honest in it's portrayal of gay sex and all that. And that's fine. But I do feel its very simplistic to think of the film as nothing less than a 'gay love story', despite its period setting and gay love story.

I'm sorry Adiass but I got the impression that Ang Lee was more interested in exploring the notion of bruised masculinity rather than man on man love. Just watch the film again. Look at how the characters don't even know what to term their relationship. They refer to it as a 'situation'.

Heath Ledger's Ennis even limits the relationship to monthly and annually fishing vacations. This to me suggests that Lee was more interested in a relationship that was built around masculine identity than a film about gay love. Take that as a homophobic statement if it makes you feel any better about yourself, Adiass. I'll just say you're hetrophobic in return, innit.
 
I've heard of it and i've caught glimpses of it in the past but I never sat down to watch it. I was just wondering if he really liked it or was having a laugh because it did NOT look like Tim Burton's best work..maybe I should give it a go before I judge it though. Yup, that would be wise

But seriously, this Pee Wee geezer plays the role of a FEMME FATALE? It's not odd for the sake of it is it?
 
Thanks for the reviews Prestige not a big fan of Wolf Creek sorry.
I watched Scarface again yesterday
 
I love Snatch, Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and Layer Cake. It cracks me up a little how much some of you guys from across the pond bash Guy Ritchie. He's an excellent film maker and I am very happy that RocknRolla will be coming here in October.

Layer Cake was quite good as well but don't you guys think that if it wasn't for Ritchie that Layer Cake wouldn't have been possible? He was Guy Ritchie's producer and close friend. Don't you think it was probably Ritchie that helped him make a film like that? I do.
 
Ok so I lack the creative wit of a Joss Whedon or that stripper bird turned screen writer, but give me cred for giving it a go, eh? As i'm sure you're all well aware by now, i'm conducting my very own 'Greatest Films Ever Made' list and i'm trying to make it as comprehensive as I possibly can.

This was partly inspired by fellow Brit Pyro's 'Visual Pleasures' list and some other MoFo similarly themed thread.

As you can see, 'm taking this VERY seriously and i've been preparing for about 3 days now. I've thought long and hard about why so so film deserves it's spot and which ones belong in the top 50, etc. I've tried to look at the film for what it is what it's aims, ambition and whether or not it's successful at achieving the goals it sets out to do. I'ma do about 10 titles a day. Not too exhausting but lengthy enough to hopefully engage you all.

Anyways, I should stop chatting horses bollocks and get on with the damn thing. Bare in mind this is MY opinion and I don't speak (or type for those who want to be literal) for anybody else. So shall we commence? And here..we...go!

100: Sin City (Robert Rodriguez, 2005)



Robert Rodriguez's 2nd best film caught me by surprise. I had never heard of the the Sin City graphic novels and wasn't even that hyped for this when it first came out in the cinema. However, I was pleasantly surprised by just how imaginative, violent and fun this film was.

The idea of combining colours with black and white photography had been done before in 1997's Pleasantville. However, it had never been done so well and it definitely served Frank Miller's novel adaptation really well. It's an almost traditional film noir yet with that comic twist that really gives Sin City's it's edge. The standout in the ensemble cast is clearly Mickey Rourke's Marv. A hulking neanderthal who's beast-like looks belies a heroic figure. Great fun.

99: Jurassic Park (Steven Spielberg, 1993)



I must have been something like 8 when this film came out. I never got to see it in the cinemas, but boy did I not care at the time. This is one epic family film and despite the fact that i'm a little bit of a detractor of Spielberg, the man conjured up something we had never really seen before at that time. Something...immersive...man I love that word

The special and creature effects were OUTSTANDING. The late great Stan Winston truly made his mark here and writing about this film definately makes me miss that creative man even more. An interesting theme about the consequences of messing with nature and yadda yadda yadda. At the age of 8, these themes are a lot more profound than they may seem when a person is older, trust me. One of Spielberg's best blockbusters.

98: X-MEN 2 (Bryan Singer, 2003)



I think it's safe to say that Bryan Singer raised the bar as far as comic book sequels goes in this fantastic (and best) installment of the X-Men trilogy . The film has a good 30 mins on it's predecessor, and you really wouldn''t think so. The witty script is even sharper and the spectacle more dazzling than even before with Hugh Jackman's popular Wolverine getting the best lines and the most screen time.

But this is Singer's film, and the talented director makes good on his hints in the first film. He hinted at a real clash between the mutants and humans, and boy did he give it to us. The subtext or racism and prejudice is even more apparent here than it was in the first one, and one of many themes to raise this film from very good to GREAT.

97: Scum (Alan Clarke, 1979)



Not a lot can be said for Alan Clark's vicious and honest film, except that while really well executed in it's direction, it's really not for the faint of heart. Ray Winstone's Carling is the main 'daddy' in this film and it's fair to say that his performance probably adds a full star to it. All I can say is that this film is packed with frequent moments of brutality, but at the same time, it's a compelling piece of drama.

96: The Faculty (Robert Rodriguez, 1998)



Ok, this is gonna sound very strange. Maybe even stranger than seeing a male dressed up in female nurse gear and with clown make up smeared all over his face. But yes, Josh Hartnett was ICONIC in this film. There, I said it. This is my opinion of obviously but I really think that the Zeke character was brilliant. I don't know how but Josh Hartnett must've brought some charisma odor from somewhere because he has since been as bland as a school corridor since.

But yeah, Kevin Williamson's sharp and witty script really helps raise this generic sci-fi/horror thriller to great. It's a cult classic and the combination of The Breakfast Club meets Invasions Of a Body Snatcher concept really makes this film appear fresh. The group dynamics work and theres some brilliant exchange between the characters. Yes, it's silly stuff and the theme of kids having to rely on drugs to get them out of trouble may raise some eyebrows, but I still think it's Rodriguez's best film...and his most underrated.

95: Superman: The Movie (Richard Donner, 1978)



I am NOT a fan of Superman at all. In fact, i'd go as far as to say I dislike the character a lot. HOWEVER, I can give credit to where credit is due and in this case, the credit is due to Richard Donner's ambitious and epic origin take on the 'Man Of Steel'. This is the film that basically set the template for Christopher Nolan's Batman Begins and featured a wonderful performance by the late Christopher Reeve.

For it's time, the special effects were pretty stunning. It also gets credit for being one of the first 'superhero' flicks to be taken seriously.

94: London To Brighton (Paul Andrew Williams, 2006)



I really liked Paul Andrew William's debut. It was fresh and something different. But I find myself rarely watching it because it's just so nasty. The film deals with underage prostitution, paedophilia, gangsters, some awful 'sex' sequences, people being cut and left to bled. You name it, this film is an exercise in brutality.

There are moments of beautiful cinematography yet it's contrasted with the most disturbing sequence. A little known film to watch assuming you can stomach it.

93: Brokeback Mountain (Ang Lee, 2005)



Forget the whole homosexual theme that the film is generally known for. This film is truly about man's need for male companionship. At least that what it seemed to be saying to me. That subtext is so strong that I almost found the homosexuality aspect to be irrelevant. Ang Lee clearly went out of his way to make sure every shot composition was of equal importance. A good love drama with a revelationary turn by Heath Ledger.

92: The Deer Hunter (Michael Cimino, 1978)



This film isn't very high on my list for a reason. Yes, I do think there theres an undertone of racism in the vietcong scenes, and I think such a scene justifies why I would think such a thing. The sad part is the film is so tragic and emotionally compelling in all it's other areas that I really couldn't just ignore it.

Robert DeNiro and Christopher Walken give arguably the best performances of their career. And DeNiro's signature line, 'this is this!' still has me thinking about the meaning of his rather arkward outburst. Michael Cimino is not interested in the war but rather the repurcussions that war has on individuals and how they respond. I think I even cried when i watched this film when you know who dies at the end.

91: Casino Royale (Martin Campbell, 2006)



I'm not even a big Bond fan, but one has to appreciate the risk and reinvention they took with this. It was risky hiring an actor who wasn't coventionally attractive to the female eye, yet, Daniel Craig's Bond is up there with Sean Connery as a man who's as charming as he is violent. You can feel the influence of the Bourne franchise is Bond's recent outing, and that's not a bad thing at all.

However, as great as Daniel Craig is, I have to give a heads up to Eva Green. France's finest had me fooled with her English accent. I honestly thought she was a Brit until I read that she was actually french. Her performance is also the best out of any Bond bird i've seen and I generally felt sad when you know what happened to her.

Anyways, standout scene has to be the torturing of Bond and his privates! As painful as that scene looked, Daniel Craig had me in fits of laughter with THAT line. Probably the best Bond film thus far.

90: Dressed To Kill (Brian DePalma, 1980)



Believe it or not, but Brian DePalma was once an exciting director who was apart of the new breed of cinema with the likes of Scorsese, Spielberg, Coppola, etc. This film, despite a slight misogynistic undertone to it, was the film that defined him. Yes, it borrows heavily from Hitchcock to say the least, but it's still a damn fine thriller from a man who makes no secret of his love for Hitchcock's work. A creepy performance by Sir Michael Caine doesn't hurt it either. I also have to add that it has one of the best openings to a film ever, and I don't mean that in a pervy sense


Ok guys, that's it for now and i'll post 10 more tomorrow.
 
So lets continue...


79: The Godfather (Francis Ford Coppola, 1972)



Now, i'm not as in love with this film as most people are, which is why it sits here at number 79, but this highly rated gangster film is very good indeed. In terms of technical aspects, it's great and boost rich cinematography. It's an emotionally resonant crime story in which acts of violence and immorality can be overlooked depending on how powerful a figure is.

Everybody mentions Brando's performance a Vito Corleone (and rightly so). However, I really think that Al Pacino's performance stands out the most in this first installment. His transformation from college boy to big time gangster is handled with patience and skill. To think he was close to losing the role to Robert Redford really worries me about Hollywood. He was too short, too average, too ethnic looking for the studio...but thank god Coppola sorted those big wigs out and made the film the way he wanted to.

Oh, and hooray for cotton buds..

78: Jaws (Steven Spielberg, 1975)



Despite the dodgy looking rubber shark, Jaws still has the power to shock, thrill and leave you exhausted. It was also one of the first of a wave of 'summer blockbuster' films shown.

In fact, that the shark is so dodgy looking may have actually helped the film. Rather than going all the way, Spielberg realises that the 'less you see, the more scary it is' formula really raises the bar on this film.

The characters are an interesting bunch, too, with Roy Schneider being the best of them. I love how at the end he gets all bad arse and says, 'smile you son of a biatch!' . Still one of my favourite quip before a death.

77. Mean Creek (Jacob Aaron Estes, 2004)



I watched this little underrated gem a few years back, and I immediately liked it. Yes, the similarities between this and Stand By Me were always going to be inevitable, but I can honestly say that this film is better than it's inspiration. Where Stand By Me featured a bunch of amicable leads that looked fresh faced and innocent, Mean Creeks offers a bunch of teenagers that are moody and almost unlikable. Just the way I like it. I'm a gloomy bastard, I know.

The film also has an eerie feel to it. I think it's the desaturated photography or the atmospheric location. Either way, it more than adds to the mood of this coming of age thriller. Definitely deserves it's place on my list.

76: The Imitation Of Life (Douglas Sirk, 1959)



Caught this film at a film studies screening. Our module concentrated on melodrama and I was charmed by this film the moment I had read the synopsis. From my understanding, this film was one of the first to explore the cultural divide between white and black people in America.

Despite the period, Sirk is clearly much more interested in the relationship between Annie and her lighter skinned daughter who passes for white than he is with his famous leading star. Issues of identity and race are handled sensitively, and I really just find the ending tragic. Great melodrama.


75. Brick (Rian Johnson, 2005)



It's got to be said, Joseph Levitt Gordon is one of my favourite actors right now. I never thought i'd say that about any actor who was on 3rd Rock From The Sun, but Gordon has come a long long long way from that generic comedy show.

One of Brick's interesting features is not it's noir plot transferred to a contemporary American high school, or the fact that it subverts the genre making it both post modern and retro at the same time, but it's inventive and slang heavy dialogue that i'm surprised isn't apart of pop culture literature right now.

It's worth noting that Johnson edited his fine debut on a Mac, and it doesn't even show. There are some lovely poetic scenes in this thriller. Joseph Levitt showed he is easily able to deliver first class leading man roles, too. I find myself looking forward to his every film, and he sort of remains me of Heath Ledger from a physical stand point.

74: - Ok i'm a tad bit tired right now so i'ma have to finish off the 4th lot tomorrow.
 
Scarface, good. Haven't seen any of the others and I'm not really into horror so probably never will, but you're doing quite a good job with your little write ups at saying why you like them
 
The argument started with his misinterpretation of the film and stretched to gay cinema AFTER he specifically said (I can only assume he had a brain spasm) Brokeback was NOT a gay film (I'm not twisting anybody's words there buddy, that bit was black and white). I repeated my question about gay cinema after he denied another film of this title (or are we disputing he said that too?). I was merely asking what does qualify as gay cinema for him, but obviously that's a bit too much to process...


Funny that he should say that, seeing as how no one actually said it was. What I said was that Brokeback was a gay film, to which he replied it wasn't because it isn't a part of the new queer cinema. I think it was only reasonable for me to point out what I have about gay cinema not being new queer cinema. It's great that you two can read each other's thoughts, the rest of us can only try to interpret your writing, a daunting task at times...

And now we all agree that you were completely wrong, hurray...

Oh I got that bit...I believe I laughed a few pages back. Again, it's not because I'm gay, it's because I have common sense, and have a sick need to instill it into everyone, including the likes of you.

That's partly true, although I would say I look for any sign of stupidity from others so I can have a go. I'm just not a very nice person... Nope, the fact that I'm smart (and can actually spell) does...
 
Damnit, was hoping you'd make a post before starting your list so i could make the "but Christopher Nolan hasn't made 100 films" joke.
 
Back
Top