Super Bowl Eats
- Thread starter Nadiyah
- Start date
Jellybean Chic
New member
L G wrote:
finding
those
ask
the
L G,
I think it has something to do with Federal law overriding state law.
All I know is it's a Federal crime to rob a State liquor store. I don't
mean to know the exact wording or meaning of the applicable laws.
Best,
Andy
finding
those
ask
the
L G,
I think it has something to do with Federal law overriding state law.
All I know is it's a Federal crime to rob a State liquor store. I don't
mean to know the exact wording or meaning of the applicable laws.
Best,
Andy
I am a Bad Man
New member
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:24:55 -0800, sf arranged
random neurons and said:
IIRC (and Gloria P can correct me if I'm wrong), there was a drive
through window at a liquor store in Cherry Creek (Fillmore? First
Ave?) in Denver. Right next to a really cool old bar...?
Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
--
To reply, remove "spambot" and replace it with "cox"
random neurons and said:
IIRC (and Gloria P can correct me if I'm wrong), there was a drive
through window at a liquor store in Cherry Creek (Fillmore? First
Ave?) in Denver. Right next to a really cool old bar...?
Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
--
To reply, remove "spambot" and replace it with "cox"
Bluto Blutarsky76
New member
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:59:50 -0800, Terry Pulliam Burd
wrote:
Where were you when Becca and I talked about drive thru bars and the
conclusion was 2 states?
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
wrote:
Where were you when Becca and I talked about drive thru bars and the
conclusion was 2 states?
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
??????Cool??????
New member
sf wrote:
Bars and liquor stores are different critters. There are more than
2 states with drive-through liquor stores-
AZ, MI, CO - and a plethora of southern states, I believe.
Jim
Bars and liquor stores are different critters. There are more than
2 states with drive-through liquor stores-
AZ, MI, CO - and a plethora of southern states, I believe.
Jim
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:07:00 -0500, Tara
wrote:
Oh, okay Tara... if there's no lime juice, then I'd try one and
probably like it too. Sounds like one of those drinks young people
tend to order when the objective it to get drunk without tasting any
booze. Oh, yeah. BTDT
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
wrote:
Oh, okay Tara... if there's no lime juice, then I'd try one and
probably like it too. Sounds like one of those drinks young people
tend to order when the objective it to get drunk without tasting any
booze. Oh, yeah. BTDT
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
I wrote:
I didn't use sugar or Maggi sauce in the rub; I used salt, pepper, and
MSG. I put Maggi sauce into the "slather" with the other listed
ingredients instead.
I used to have a Ronco rotisserie. Although the rotisserie is long
gone, it came with a pair of insulated gloves which can handle
carrying a sizzling-hot chicken. After crushing the peanuts (in a
ziploc bag, lightly pounding with the bottom of a saucepan), I
sprinkled them on the ribs and then donned those gloves to kind of
press the peanuts into the meat so they wouldn't fall off. As noted,
the ribs were then broiled until crunchy on the outside. They were
outstanding.
I made a stir-fry instead of skewers. Instead of parboiling the
broccoli stems and artichoke, I just added them to the pan earlier
than the other items. The dish was seasoned with salt, white pepper,
and white vinegar. While the artichoke and jicama made it completely
non-Asian, it was very nice indeed. Lin commented that more stir-fries
should use artichokes.
Even though I hadn't made skewers, I made the China Moon sauce anyway;
it went nicely both with the vegetables and the ribs. We rounded off
the meal with a brown rice pilaf. I note that the sauce is a good way
to use cilantro stems! (They get liquefied in the blender.)
Specifically, it was a new beer from Sierra Nevada:
http://www.sierranevada.com/beers/glissade.html
Pictures will be posted on Lin's Facebook page because Sheldon can eat
a bag of shit.
Bob
I didn't use sugar or Maggi sauce in the rub; I used salt, pepper, and
MSG. I put Maggi sauce into the "slather" with the other listed
ingredients instead.
I used to have a Ronco rotisserie. Although the rotisserie is long
gone, it came with a pair of insulated gloves which can handle
carrying a sizzling-hot chicken. After crushing the peanuts (in a
ziploc bag, lightly pounding with the bottom of a saucepan), I
sprinkled them on the ribs and then donned those gloves to kind of
press the peanuts into the meat so they wouldn't fall off. As noted,
the ribs were then broiled until crunchy on the outside. They were
outstanding.
I made a stir-fry instead of skewers. Instead of parboiling the
broccoli stems and artichoke, I just added them to the pan earlier
than the other items. The dish was seasoned with salt, white pepper,
and white vinegar. While the artichoke and jicama made it completely
non-Asian, it was very nice indeed. Lin commented that more stir-fries
should use artichokes.
Even though I hadn't made skewers, I made the China Moon sauce anyway;
it went nicely both with the vegetables and the ribs. We rounded off
the meal with a brown rice pilaf. I note that the sauce is a good way
to use cilantro stems! (They get liquefied in the blender.)
Specifically, it was a new beer from Sierra Nevada:
http://www.sierranevada.com/beers/glissade.html
Pictures will be posted on Lin's Facebook page because Sheldon can eat
a bag of shit.
Bob
jump on it
New member
On 2/7/2011 11:29 PM, sf wrote:
Having just recently taken a US History college course, I think you're
correct and this is why state gov was initiated.
Having just recently taken a US History college course, I think you're
correct and this is why state gov was initiated.
In article , [email protected]
says...
If the Federal government is allowed any jurisdiction at all in the
particular matter.
For pot that's true--the Federal drug laws, like much other Federal
legislation that affects the actions of individuals, is based in the
Commerce Clause, with the theory being that drugs are traded in
interstate commerce and thus those who trade them are subject to Federal
jurisdiction.
However if you kill your wife in California, even though there is a
Federal law that says that you can't kill your wife, there is nothing
the Federal government can do about it unless you did it on a Federal
reservation or the like, as there is no power enumerated to Congress
that gives them jurisdiction in such a matter.
says...
If the Federal government is allowed any jurisdiction at all in the
particular matter.
For pot that's true--the Federal drug laws, like much other Federal
legislation that affects the actions of individuals, is based in the
Commerce Clause, with the theory being that drugs are traded in
interstate commerce and thus those who trade them are subject to Federal
jurisdiction.
However if you kill your wife in California, even though there is a
Federal law that says that you can't kill your wife, there is nothing
the Federal government can do about it unless you did it on a Federal
reservation or the like, as there is no power enumerated to Congress
that gives them jurisdiction in such a matter.
cheerforlife
New member
In article ,
"Peaches" wrote:
We had chili, Cuban peanut chicken wings, assorted salads, corn bread,
chips, salsa, guacamole, mini-bar cookies, and drinkables (alcoholic and
non). A fine time was had by all. Our new kitten, Neli, provided ample
entertainment during slow points in the game.
Cindy
--
C.J. Fuller
Delete the obvious to email me
"Peaches" wrote:
We had chili, Cuban peanut chicken wings, assorted salads, corn bread,
chips, salsa, guacamole, mini-bar cookies, and drinkables (alcoholic and
non). A fine time was had by all. Our new kitten, Neli, provided ample
entertainment during slow points in the game.
Cindy
--
C.J. Fuller
Delete the obvious to email me
In article ,
sf wrote:
I'm not a lawyer either, but to provide an example, the Federal minimum
wage law says that if you are subject to more than one minimum wage law
where you are in the US, you get the highest. Thus, in San Francisco,
you get the SF minimum wage not the federal or state. In California as
a whole, even though federal law lets restaurants pay servers a much
lower minimum wage, California law has no such provision, so servers in
California have the same minimum wage as others.
And the idea of "strongest" makes no sense to me, legally. It all
depends on whose ox is being gored. If I owned a business, my idea of
the "strongest" law might be one that had no restrictions on minimum
wages, to give me maximum flexibility.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
sf wrote:
I'm not a lawyer either, but to provide an example, the Federal minimum
wage law says that if you are subject to more than one minimum wage law
where you are in the US, you get the highest. Thus, in San Francisco,
you get the SF minimum wage not the federal or state. In California as
a whole, even though federal law lets restaurants pay servers a much
lower minimum wage, California law has no such provision, so servers in
California have the same minimum wage as others.
And the idea of "strongest" makes no sense to me, legally. It all
depends on whose ox is being gored. If I owned a business, my idea of
the "strongest" law might be one that had no restrictions on minimum
wages, to give me maximum flexibility.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]