Skeptics - explain the reason in correlating sunspot cycle length to temp instead of

  • Thread starter Thread starter Richard
  • Start date Start date
R

Richard

Guest
sunspots/year to temp/yr?
Thanks very little to Jim Z for explaining the skeptic reasoning. It was more than the first two, but that's not saying much.
Dana - the only way for them to find a possible correlation was to invert the y-axis.
That is invert the y-axis for sunspot cycle only.
 
"But another solar scientist, Oleg Sorokhtin, of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, believes the solar drought is an indication that Earth will enter a period of cooling."

Why don't you ask Oleg Sorokhtin this question, he will have an answer.

Sunspot cycles vary in length. With the climate being so complex, it would require further research to study and distinguish how sunspots affect the climate on an annual basis. But, this is just a theory, like AGW. There is a strong correlation between sunspot activity and the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age. Those were extended periods of sunspot activity, both high and low.

The good news, they are beginning their research and will have a more definitive answer, hopefully soon.
 
I dont even know what that means? Stop trying to confuse everyone.
Proponents are those who must prove their case not "skeptics"
 
Back
Top