Feminecronomicon
New member
artificial constructs? While the nature of gender roles differ from culture to culture, it is a fact that every culture has prescribed gender roles. Feminists claim that these roles are artificial and should be eliminated because they are oppressive. But isn't the fact that they consistently exist in one form or another indicative of the fact that gender roles are actually derived from our very nature and not artificial at all? Are feminists, in their convoluted quest to advance a genderless utopia, trying to destroy a fundamental characteristic shared by all of humanity?
Cosmic Catastrophe: You failed to address my question and used a red herring. Obviously the manifestation of gender roles differs across cultures (as does the nature of food). But gender roles nonetheless are manifested everywhere just as food is consumed everywhere. So why should we believe feminists who claim, without evidence, that gender roles are unnatural...When they naturally occur everywhere?
Ashleigh: I never took Anthropology 101. I was busy with real classes like honors differential equations, organic chemistry, physics and the like. If I wanted to take Anthropology 101, I would have taken it in Jr High School.
Cosmic Catastrophe: You failed to address my question and used a red herring. Obviously the manifestation of gender roles differs across cultures (as does the nature of food). But gender roles nonetheless are manifested everywhere just as food is consumed everywhere. So why should we believe feminists who claim, without evidence, that gender roles are unnatural...When they naturally occur everywhere?
Ashleigh: I never took Anthropology 101. I was busy with real classes like honors differential equations, organic chemistry, physics and the like. If I wanted to take Anthropology 101, I would have taken it in Jr High School.