Shouldnt there be a debate instead of mudslinging with global climate change?

hoggod

New member
trying to be neutral, have the proponents of both sides come foward with verifyable facts, unaltered and unopinionated studies, come together and provide a scientific debate or consensus as to what level things are actually occuring, instead of one dismissing the other and causing actions that could be harmful and destructive to many cultures.
heres the thing the amount of human interaction can not be determined being that we are using what is on this planet in a closed environment, but lets say for a second that the closed environment expands because more of its solid matter oh say expands causing more atmosphere and thus more surface area of the atmosphere and allow for greater heating and cooling capacities, wouldnt the scales be on an exponentially smaller scale than the linear one used by both sides?
 
lets face it, there will never be an agreement, even if there is a nice debate

china, india etc will not stop using fossil fuels as they are rapidly growing and industrialising
 
Back
Top