Should he have to pay child support even though he made it clear that he didn't want kids?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lea Marie
  • Start date Start date
L

Lea Marie

Guest
If a man tells a female he's having sex with that he doesn't want a child and she reassures him that she's on the pill but ends up pregnant... Should he still have to pay child support? Why or why not?Nikki - You said something interesting: "If a woman tells a man before getting in bed with him that she does not want kids and he wears a condom should she have to support the kid?"Now i'm assuming that he wears a condom but she still ends up pregnant... If he WANTS the child but she doesn't, she can ALWAYS get an abortion. Men have no say over what women do with their bodies. It's kind of sad actually because I know women will take advantage of that.Sami - This is a freaking hypothetical question. Take your BS elsewhere.
 
um everyone knows pills aren't 100% so wtf...he nutted so its partly his fault too idiot world, i swear.
 
Yes.If you don't want kids, don't have sex. PERIOD. There is no other way to prevent pregnancy 100%. Any guy that unzips better be prepared to be a daddy, no matter what the female is on or what he puts on himself.
 
Hell yeah. he chose to have sex in the first place, plus the pill doesn't always work, thats why you use another method at the same time, duhh!
 
Well if i get into a car with my sister who I let drive.If she has a license and wrecks another can...will I be held responsie as the insured party.the answer is yes.Engaging in an act MAKES you responsible
 
i agree with AJ, and women are devious enough or stupid enough to have sex not being 100% protected or wanting a reason to keep a man in their life. To trap a man with kids has got to be the most desperate thing. But in the end the kids are important and he is just as responsible as the mother.
 
Of course, the child has 2 parents. They both have to support it. If you don't want children, don't have sex. SIMPLE !
 
Legally, yes. The man has no decision making ability in the U.S.Whether he pays support, or whether the child is aborted, is up to the women.
 
No because the man didn't want the child. Therefore he shouldn't have to be involved in the child's life nor help provide for it. Theirs actually a case like this presently in court pending.
 
No.If the woman lied and decived to have a child and trap a man then he should not be held responisble. Saying that she was on the pill and not being on it is a desperate and quite evil thing to do tbh. I think the courts put to much responsibility on the man to do and pay for everything,if the mommy wanted to have kids so bad that she couldn't respect her boyfriends wishes,then she should be 100% responsible for taking care of that child.
 
yup. sorry, but its still his kid (if it is his kid, LOL!!) and someone has to help pay to raise it and I prefer it not be me!
 
Back
Top