Reply to post #117: (damn, 3 posts while I typed this :huh
Funny I was going to mention that myself.
I think it was clear to most people that participated in the thread that you were understanding with him, and wouldn't take drastic actions. I'm not blaming you personally, I'm blaming the site or who did it. It wasn't clear on my post, but I was replying to ikiller, my bad.
It's normal that you stand by the owner's decision. I respect that.
But my thoughts are these: you (supervisor, I don't know which of them you are at CN, just curious) were trying to debate your points of view on a board known to have members who express their hostile views freely, where everyone stands on the same level and subject to harsh criticism, no matter if they staff here or at CN or at the Olympus, and your efforts to pass a more positive message about how you guys deal with your members were shot dead with this move.
I know you won't reinstate his account, because you can't (or shouldn't), I understand that perfectly. I wouldn't reenable a member if it was RealitY or tesco the ones who did it. But if I remember all the thread correctly, you never asked the staff to close/trash whatever the thread. This way we could have said no, and be the ones to take all the blame.
You also know that these donations problems are the issue of the moment on bt, generally speaking. It's the recession, no one runs away from it. And sooner or later this issue would have gotten here and become discussed. You were handling it well, but unfortunately for CN, you were the exception.
I don't expect you to reply to most of my points, but the way it ended up for champo101 doesn't look good on CN. This is the bare truth.
Funny I was going to mention that myself.
I think it was clear to most people that participated in the thread that you were understanding with him, and wouldn't take drastic actions. I'm not blaming you personally, I'm blaming the site or who did it. It wasn't clear on my post, but I was replying to ikiller, my bad.
It's normal that you stand by the owner's decision. I respect that.
But my thoughts are these: you (supervisor, I don't know which of them you are at CN, just curious) were trying to debate your points of view on a board known to have members who express their hostile views freely, where everyone stands on the same level and subject to harsh criticism, no matter if they staff here or at CN or at the Olympus, and your efforts to pass a more positive message about how you guys deal with your members were shot dead with this move.
I know you won't reinstate his account, because you can't (or shouldn't), I understand that perfectly. I wouldn't reenable a member if it was RealitY or tesco the ones who did it. But if I remember all the thread correctly, you never asked the staff to close/trash whatever the thread. This way we could have said no, and be the ones to take all the blame.
You also know that these donations problems are the issue of the moment on bt, generally speaking. It's the recession, no one runs away from it. And sooner or later this issue would have gotten here and become discussed. You were handling it well, but unfortunately for CN, you were the exception.
I don't expect you to reply to most of my points, but the way it ended up for champo101 doesn't look good on CN. This is the bare truth.
isn't he cn's dog?
