Richard Swinburne defends a version of the Argument from Design in which he doesn’t have to take exception with Darwin. On the contrary, Swinburne is happy to concede that Darwin is right about the nature of complex adaptive biological systems. Swinburne thinks we still need God, however, to account for more basic features of our universe. What is Swinburne’s argument? Is it a good argument? Explain.
Richard Swinburne's argument from design?
- Thread starter Kevin
- Start date