AerodynamiC_Great
New member
This quote by Richard Dawkins, "There's real poetry in the real world. Science is the poetry of reality" got me thinking recently. You may be surprised why I said respectful insolence; just an oxymoron extrapolating the 'fine line' between believing something and not. I am not an atheist but I am quite fascinated by the beauty of the quote and how it can really manifest what it transpires. I just mean that, as a monotheist, how do you think science could be a basis of everything without accepting the existence of supreme being? Some may argue that there is no empirical evidence to back the claim that there is a supreme being but it seems that, in extreme cases, nature practically dwells in the manipulation of supreme being, which is God. As a science student, I don't object to the notion of asking and inquiring but, in my opinion, I think it is how we interpret that begs lots of questions. What do you guys think?