All I hear is holy matrimony this holy matrimony that, but when you are trying to make an argument for why OTHER PEOPLE should be legally banned from a particular action, saying that it is against your personal religious belief is not a valid argument in American courts.
If something is against your religion, then no one is forcing you to partake in it, but that right to practice your religion is only to the extent that it doesn't interfere with the rights of others.
And this lack of ANY valid legal foundation is exactly why courts are ruling in favor of same sex marriage 99% of the time. That said, what is your legal argument against same sex marriage, now that it's clear that judges support separation of church and state? If you don't have one, then you are going to continue to lose in court.
If something is against your religion, then no one is forcing you to partake in it, but that right to practice your religion is only to the extent that it doesn't interfere with the rights of others.
And this lack of ANY valid legal foundation is exactly why courts are ruling in favor of same sex marriage 99% of the time. That said, what is your legal argument against same sex marriage, now that it's clear that judges support separation of church and state? If you don't have one, then you are going to continue to lose in court.