Question for republicans who whine about the economy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bran E
  • Start date Start date
B

Bran E

Guest
Since this is what you got when you voted for Bush in 2004, why don't you just shut your mouths and let the intelligent party handle things? You made your bed so there is no reason for you people to whine when you have to lie in it.
Can't send your kids to college, can't afford to retire, there was a time to think of that and it was before you voted in 2004, not now.
Dahmond H: Your saying Clinton's Arkansas had a bad economy, that sure does contradict the fact that it was rated best managed state in 1992 and had the second lowest tax burden in the country. Anyone can make things up, the democrats use actual facts though, call us crazy.
wes S, because the POTUS sets the budget that's how.
Obama is going to save all your ingrateful asses just like Bill Clinton did.
 
Bush did not cause the mortgage companies, the banks, and the auto industry to collapse, that was due to pure greed. Mortgage companies were selling homes for two to three times what they were worth and then when the bottom fell out people try selling them only to find out they owed to much, that is why some people went to prison, the Banks was sleeping with the mortgage companies and got burned big time, the Auto industry refused to make a fuel efficient and dependable vehicle that the Japanese did not even had to break a sweat to take the lead. GM had the best electric car on the market called the EV1, GM decided it would be best to destroy all of them and scrape the program. Bush had nothing to do with making those decisions, I blame bush for bailing them out and not giving the taxpayers something to show for it.
 
Democrats played a HUGE part in the financial crisis! Don't forget that it was also Bush who had issued many warnings to Congress about the dangers of Fannie / Freddie not having enough regulation. Your beloved Democrats are the ones who said everything was just fine with those companies. So much for "intelligent party".

We all have to lie in this situation and Obama planning to spend $800 billion for a "stimulus" that has $100 billion going to businesses is not going to correct their mistakes.

The Bush Administration actually had one of the highest growing economies in history up to the point where the bank failures came into play. If you take a legitimate look at the numbers, the truth is a lot different than what you have said here.

The Warlock
 
Whining? My boss gave me a great Christmas bonus. Our company has just expanded into 2 more states and he is going to buy a new company airplane this Spring so I can fly him around on business and his family for vacations. As our company offices now are spread out from FL to CT and MI, it is more efficient for him and faster than commercial. I just went to Hawaii last fall and am going on a quick little vacation to FL either late this month or in Feb.

I'm doing great but I am afraid of what Obama is going to do to our growing business. Seven years ago we started with 6 tractor-trailers and 1 terminal. We now have 6 terminals, 200+ drivers and 100+ tractor trailers and are still growing. We are fortunate enough to be hauling for a company that is doing great in this economy and by all indications, will not only continue to do so, but will thrive in a down-turned economy.

I'm good.

However, I wish 5.56x45 and 7.62x39 ammo wasn't so expensive. But that's a direct result of Obama being elected, not Bush's fault.
 
This isn't what we got when we voted for Bush in 2004... It's what we get when we elect a Governor, from a state with the second worse economy in the nation as president. For the liberals out there... that's right I'm talking about the golden boy himself, Bill Clinton. However, knowing he was screwing things up from jump street, I made a few changes... and guess what scooter?.... I'm not whining about the economy.
 
In the run up to the 2006 midterm elections the Democrats told us they had the solutions to the problems facing America. Vote for them, they said, because they can lower gas prices and fix the ailing economy (that wasn’t exactly ailing at the time). They were unable to accomplish this and they needed more power to right the ship of state. In 2008 they won even more seats and America elected a man whose citizenship is in question, all on the promise of hope and change.

Well, gas prices are the lowest they have been in years but they had to cause a complete financial meltdown to accomplish that little task. The Democrats set the table for the financial meltdown when people like Barney Frank, Christopher Dodd, and Barack Obama were on the payroll of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Despite at least 17 warnings by the Bush administration, these people continued to insist that all was well. It was, if you were one of their friends making millions of dollars working for Fannie and Freddie.

Now though, the Democrats actually won and they will have to make good on the promises that they can fix it all. They will have to live up to promises that they can fix the economy and get people back to work. But, in true Democratic fashion, they are now lowering the bar. Once self assured in their ability to repair what is broken, the Democrats are now saying that things will take a long time to mend and that the 800 BILLION dollar stimulus package they are working on might not exactly do much.

Well who would have known? The first stimulus did not work. The bailout did not work and there is no indication that throwing more money, money we don’t have I might add, at the problem will actually fix it. The Democrats realize that they fooled millions of people into voting for them and those people will expect results. The same Democrats who wanted something done NOW are saying it might take a while.

I never had any doubt it would take a while and I also knew that stimulus packages and bailouts would not solve any problems. The end result of all the spending is that we don’t know where the money went, how much was actually spent (and what the final tally will be), or where we will find the resources to pay it back.

During the Great Depression the government threw money around and tried creating jobs. This, among other things, prolonged the depression and made things much worse.

The free market system will work out problems but it has to be a free market. We cannot have the government making rules that run contrary to the principle of a free market. We cannot allow people who do not have the means to buy a home to actually buy one. We cannot make credit rules so lax that college kids can apply for credit cards and be approved even though they are saddled with debt and have little or no income. George Bush said he is abandoning free market principles in order to save the economy but abandoning those principles is what got us in this mess in the first place.

Democrats in Washington are still subscribing to the idea that they can intervene in a free market and make things right but they are also realizing that this tact is having little effect. Thus, they are pulling back from those things they once assured us rather than admit they knew not what they were talking about in the first place.

Someone once said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

It would appear that the Democrats are insane.
 
Is that so, funny how the economy was holding its own in January of 2007, just days before the Dems took over congress. You do realize congress controls the purse strings..right? Here is an ad from the NY Times stating how well the economy was holding up during a time of war, right before your Dems took over.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/19/business/19econ.html?_r=1
 
Back
Top