S
SomeOne
Guest
Preparing for a debate for atheism. Tell me if these arguments are good and give suggestions. I'm going to make them sort of brief.
Why explain something complex by assuming something even more complex?
The universe appears to be naturalistic...
# of Galaxies
Evolution
Abiogenesis
Chemical Evolution
Star Formation
Therefore there is no necessity to invoke God.
Free Will is unsupported by evidence...
Humans are products of evolution, this contradicts the Bible.
Chromosome #2 = Fusion, human common ancestory has been verified by this finding.
I have more but that's enough for now.
It's going to be a debate for wherever one is needed, both probably. Coming up soon an online one.
Both good ones Glacier, thanks. High hydrogen content is basically evidence of star formation. The fate argument is pretty good, it'll go well with the free will argument too but can also work independently.
For guy #4 you'd be surprised at how many people really can be persuaded. They just don't do it on the spot, but many times it just takes a wedge of doubt to lead to the inevitable.
Why explain something complex by assuming something even more complex?
The universe appears to be naturalistic...
# of Galaxies
Evolution
Abiogenesis
Chemical Evolution
Star Formation
Therefore there is no necessity to invoke God.
Free Will is unsupported by evidence...
Humans are products of evolution, this contradicts the Bible.
Chromosome #2 = Fusion, human common ancestory has been verified by this finding.
I have more but that's enough for now.
It's going to be a debate for wherever one is needed, both probably. Coming up soon an online one.
Both good ones Glacier, thanks. High hydrogen content is basically evidence of star formation. The fate argument is pretty good, it'll go well with the free will argument too but can also work independently.
For guy #4 you'd be surprised at how many people really can be persuaded. They just don't do it on the spot, but many times it just takes a wedge of doubt to lead to the inevitable.