Olivet Dis-course: debate of two Sons Jesus: Son of God and Son of man: "he said" and

A

Allegory

New member
then "said he"? Why is it when it changes from "he said" to "said he" it gets 'divisional',
and even what's Right of Son of man's L/R division is mirrorly reversed?
Eg: Son of man's L/R goats/sheep = everlasting punishment/life eternal;
But when "he said" changes to "said he" (mirrorly reversed),
then "eternal life" changes to "life eternal" (mirrorly reversed).
As if:
"Jesus Christ" changes to "Christ Jesus" (mirrorly reversed)
"Son of God" ("he said") changes to "Son of man" ("said he")

So the Son of man is not only L/R divisional,
but with him Right things get mirrorly reversed:
"he said" gets mirrorly reversed to "said he",
"eternal life" gets mirrorly reversed to "life eternal",
as if peace, not divided changes to division, not peace.

"everlasting punishment"<--over against-->"life eternal";
with both "everlasting" vs "eternal" meaning same thing?
Seems to be still "division" (twain), not yet peace (one).
Any kingdom divided, against itself, falls to desolation?
Everlasting Punishment vs Life Eternal is still dividead,
as if Law vs Law of Them vs Them is as Loser vs Loser.

Usward (one) seems to neither of Them vs Them (twain).
Usward is accounted as salvation (unity, gathering).
Them vs Them is account as war (division, scattering).

The end is not yet, if still hearing of them vs them wars?
 
Back
Top