In the midst of the controversy over U.S. surveillance this summer, top intelligence officials held a briefing for President Obama at the White House – one that would provide him with a broad inventory of programs being carried out by the National Security Agency.
Some of those programs, including the collection of e-mails and other communications from overseas, had already been disclosed because of leaks from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. But Obama was also informed of at least one program whose scope surprised him: “head of state collection.”
Video
White House press secretary Jay Carney said last week that the U.S. "is not monitoring and will not monitor" the communications of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, but didn't comment on whether it had in the past.
More from PostPolitics
Chris Cillizza and Sean Sullivan
Two past Iowa rock stars who ended up in two very different political places in the state.
Glenn Kessler
Ken Cuccinelli claims McAuliffe’s spending plans will mean higher taxes. Where do the numbers come from?
Josh Hicks
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) set a deadline of Monday for Health and Human Services to provide detailed information about the failures.
CALCULATOR | Use this tool to figure out how much health coverage might cost you on the new online marketplaces under the new health-care law.
Read more
That program, whose targets included the communications of U.S. allies such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel, began in 2002, according to administration officials. The president never knew that the program targeted American allies, administration officials said, adding that he was aware of collection efforts aimed at leaders of “adversarial countries.”
Officials — who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe still-classified activities in general terms — declined to outline the scope of the “head of state” collection program. They added that although Obama ordered the curtailing of some of the program and informed Merkel that the United States was not currently monitoring her calls, he was not angered that intelligence officials had not told him sooner about the eavesdropping.
“Their job is to get as much information for policymakers as possible,” a senior administration official said. “They’re used to coming at this from the other direction — that is, being criticized for not knowing enough. This is a new dynamic for them.”
If Obama and senior officials at the White House were unaware of the program, so, too, were key lawmakers, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who said Monday that her panel had not been properly informed of activities going back a decade or more.
“With respect to NSA collection of intelligence on leaders of U.S. allies—including France, Spain, Mexico and Germany — let me state unequivocally: I am totally opposed,” Feinstein said in a statement, adding that her committee would “initiate a major review into all intelligence collection programs.”
“Unless the United States is engaged in hostilities against a country or there is an emergency need for this type of surveillance,” she said, “I do not believe the United States should be collecting phone calls or emails of friendly presidents and prime ministers. The president should be required to approve any collection of this sort.”
White House officials said Obama was not told about the world leader surveillance program before this summer because briefings are tailored to the president’s priorities. Iran, China, counterterrorism and other concerns ranked ahead of an accounting of intelligence collected about leaders of allies as Germany, the officials said.
They said it came up only after news reports of NSA spying appeared in Brazil and in Mexico, among other countries. Obama asked for information on what exactly the agency was doing in those allied countries and in others.
Some of those programs, including the collection of e-mails and other communications from overseas, had already been disclosed because of leaks from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. But Obama was also informed of at least one program whose scope surprised him: “head of state collection.”
Video
White House press secretary Jay Carney said last week that the U.S. "is not monitoring and will not monitor" the communications of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, but didn't comment on whether it had in the past.
More from PostPolitics
Chris Cillizza and Sean Sullivan Two past Iowa rock stars who ended up in two very different political places in the state.
Glenn Kessler Ken Cuccinelli claims McAuliffe’s spending plans will mean higher taxes. Where do the numbers come from?
Josh Hicks Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) set a deadline of Monday for Health and Human Services to provide detailed information about the failures.
CALCULATOR | Use this tool to figure out how much health coverage might cost you on the new online marketplaces under the new health-care law.Read more
That program, whose targets included the communications of U.S. allies such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel, began in 2002, according to administration officials. The president never knew that the program targeted American allies, administration officials said, adding that he was aware of collection efforts aimed at leaders of “adversarial countries.”
Officials — who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe still-classified activities in general terms — declined to outline the scope of the “head of state” collection program. They added that although Obama ordered the curtailing of some of the program and informed Merkel that the United States was not currently monitoring her calls, he was not angered that intelligence officials had not told him sooner about the eavesdropping.
“Their job is to get as much information for policymakers as possible,” a senior administration official said. “They’re used to coming at this from the other direction — that is, being criticized for not knowing enough. This is a new dynamic for them.”
If Obama and senior officials at the White House were unaware of the program, so, too, were key lawmakers, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who said Monday that her panel had not been properly informed of activities going back a decade or more.
“With respect to NSA collection of intelligence on leaders of U.S. allies—including France, Spain, Mexico and Germany — let me state unequivocally: I am totally opposed,” Feinstein said in a statement, adding that her committee would “initiate a major review into all intelligence collection programs.”
“Unless the United States is engaged in hostilities against a country or there is an emergency need for this type of surveillance,” she said, “I do not believe the United States should be collecting phone calls or emails of friendly presidents and prime ministers. The president should be required to approve any collection of this sort.”
White House officials said Obama was not told about the world leader surveillance program before this summer because briefings are tailored to the president’s priorities. Iran, China, counterterrorism and other concerns ranked ahead of an accounting of intelligence collected about leaders of allies as Germany, the officials said.
They said it came up only after news reports of NSA spying appeared in Brazil and in Mexico, among other countries. Obama asked for information on what exactly the agency was doing in those allied countries and in others.