Nokia E61 VS. Samsung D900

T

trunks2kawaii

New member
I know I want one of these phones and I'm leaning towards the Nokia for it's reliability, signal strength and wifi.

I like the D900 for its looks and for its great camera, but if it's anything like the A707 I had for a day, I'd hate it for sure.

Totally torn. I question whether or not I'd ever really use the wifi, but I think it would be damn nice to have. I also question whether or not I'd use the D900's camera, though I think it would be damn nice to have as well and I think I would use it.

I read reviews saying good and bad things about each phone. It seems the bad on the D900 are worse than the bad for the E61 (screens breaking, crappy signal, crappy battery, compared the E61s "sluggishness" between apps" and lack of camera.

I presently have a nokia 6010 on its last legs, but it's an awesome basic phone. I'm now more of a business man and need a new, nice phone.

Is either one of these clearly a "better" phone, or does it simply come down to narrowing down what I want?

Thanks.
 
for signal strength, i would be more likely to prefer the nokia. for reliability, i would be more inclined to trust the samsung.

for business needs, you would be better off with the E61. symbian and WM smartphones tend to be slow anyway, so the E61 is no exception.
 
Back
Top