NHS privatization, support or refute?

In the UK the government holds a monopoly in health care, which in economic terms will result in the highest price and the worst care. It is vastly shown in britain that the government causes vast inefficiencies in an extension of Parkinson's laws - the pointless administrative managers. There are enormous waiting times for surgeries and checkups.

To those who state america know this; not everyone is covered in america. This is because that group contains the rich like Bill Gates, illegals, newly legals and those who don't want it or need it. Not only those who cannot afford it. America it is so expensive because of medical licensing, tariffs on drugs raise the cost ten fold. It is illegal to take out medical insurance from foreign corporations, so american corporations hold a monopoly under the guise of helping american workers. People pay for their habits, like if they are fat or if they smoke they pay more for insurance. America has the best health care in the world, they have private rooms rather than our cattle factories of NHS hospitals. There are more MRIs per capita in America than in Britain. And finally government involvement which rises the cost of doing business and thus the costs under the scope of rescuing the consumer.

To those who say that it is good, let me tell you that its the doctors and nurses who are good, not the NHS itself. There is a difference between for profit and not for profit. Most hospitals in america are not for profit hospitals but are not government run. US medicare denies more claims than all other private insurers. And you can sue private insurers easier than government. As the private insurer has more to lose; customers, publicity, workers and respect.
 
Back
Top