...that you fear they will be damaged if you have to read my responses to them?
I find it amusing that you have banned me from seeing and answering your questions twice now.
That is incorrect. The bans expire after a preset time period. I did not reregister.
Decide for yourselves if this was insulting, boorish or filled with invective. Newell was so threatened by it that he deleted his question so no one would read my response.
Response to: How do Hunters Convince themselves of two things:
Few do because your statements are strawmen. They're not real arguments posited by real hunters, they're exaggerated positions that you created because they make your point seem more logical and reasonable.
Most hunters understand that arrows and bullets cause pain but strive to minimize that aspect of the kill by making good shots which result in the rapid demise of the game in as humane a manner as possible.
Most hunters do not ENJOY the specific aspect of hunting that involves the death of the animal but realize that death is a natural part of the life of any animal. Not hunting doesn't save the life of an animal, it merely consigns it to another method of dying. Killing is usually not the focus of the hunt but it's inaccurate to say that mos
**********************************
After I posted that, he banned me, deleted his question and then reposted it.
Then he answered this question by accusing me of reregistering, and by saying that my response was boorish and insulting and filled with invective.
Then he deleted his response to this question.
*************
I'm sorry, the last bit of my response above was cut off. The last two sentence should read:
Killing is usually not the focus of the hunt but it's inaccurate to say that most hunters HATE it. They accept it as a necessary aspect of hunting without either loving or hating it.
I find it amusing that you have banned me from seeing and answering your questions twice now.
That is incorrect. The bans expire after a preset time period. I did not reregister.
Decide for yourselves if this was insulting, boorish or filled with invective. Newell was so threatened by it that he deleted his question so no one would read my response.
Response to: How do Hunters Convince themselves of two things:
Few do because your statements are strawmen. They're not real arguments posited by real hunters, they're exaggerated positions that you created because they make your point seem more logical and reasonable.
Most hunters understand that arrows and bullets cause pain but strive to minimize that aspect of the kill by making good shots which result in the rapid demise of the game in as humane a manner as possible.
Most hunters do not ENJOY the specific aspect of hunting that involves the death of the animal but realize that death is a natural part of the life of any animal. Not hunting doesn't save the life of an animal, it merely consigns it to another method of dying. Killing is usually not the focus of the hunt but it's inaccurate to say that mos
**********************************
After I posted that, he banned me, deleted his question and then reposted it.
Then he answered this question by accusing me of reregistering, and by saying that my response was boorish and insulting and filled with invective.
Then he deleted his response to this question.
*************
I'm sorry, the last bit of my response above was cut off. The last two sentence should read:
Killing is usually not the focus of the hunt but it's inaccurate to say that most hunters HATE it. They accept it as a necessary aspect of hunting without either loving or hating it.