New SCOTUS ruling on anti-terror law

[Sgt. Baker]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704895204575320641631008492.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLETopStories

It's grabroad
some Elena Kagan qurabroad
es in there also cause she worked on the case for the government.

 

[Sumo]

Seems the dissenters want to use the Constitution as "blanket coverage"

 

[uneek]

I don't see how the law doesn't violate due process. the list of terrorist entities is entirely arbitrary

 

[seventh circle]

Bush didn't want activist judges, but Roberts and Scalia are brabroad
h activist judges. Bush just didn't want liberal activist judges

 

[mover]

I disagree with this ruling. I dislike where it leads.

 

[Jas0n]

Well, this ruling runs counter to my personal ideology so it's UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!1