alwaysquestion
New member
I'm a Christian Theist and would like to know some recommendations on what arguments to use. The arguments I plan to use are
1.Kalam Cosmological
2.Teleological
3.Axiological
4.From Evil
5.From Consciousness
6.Plantinga's Ontological(Might be too complicated)
7.Radical claims and uniqueness of Christ
8.Biblical reliability
9.The argument from miracles featuring the resurrection
10.From Experience
The debate format is as follows-
45 minute opening statement
35 minute rebuttal
25 minute rebuttal of the rebuttal
10 minute closing statement
Do you think I'm presenting too many arguments? Don't try to debate me now! I have a degree in psychology, Philosophy, and New Testament studies. If you want to debate email me! My biggest concerns are using the ontological(It tends to be confusing and takes a long period of time to explain) and the uniqueness of Christ(This is a very good way to set the stage for my last arguments, but it tends to take a long time).Also I will most likely not inclu8de the statments on Biblical reliability just for the sake of time. Also because Biblical reliability does not need to be established for the uniqueness argument and the resurrection argument. Eliminating this though, means I shouldn't Which arguments do you recommend?
P.S. The above arguments are the only special revelation and natural theological arguments I accept.(I didn't include arguments specifically aimed at poly/pantheism though. Nor arguments against unitarian conceptions of God such as the Islamic and Jewish conceptions of God, again for the sake of time.)
Wow I already see an Ad Hominem. Oh well! Byu the way...I am not arguing here!!!!!I'm merely asking your opinion on arguments I should and should not use.
More Ad Hominems. I'm really saddaned by the rediculous comments of "New Atheists". Bare Assertions are everywhere!
1.Kalam Cosmological
2.Teleological
3.Axiological
4.From Evil
5.From Consciousness
6.Plantinga's Ontological(Might be too complicated)
7.Radical claims and uniqueness of Christ
8.Biblical reliability
9.The argument from miracles featuring the resurrection
10.From Experience
The debate format is as follows-
45 minute opening statement
35 minute rebuttal
25 minute rebuttal of the rebuttal
10 minute closing statement
Do you think I'm presenting too many arguments? Don't try to debate me now! I have a degree in psychology, Philosophy, and New Testament studies. If you want to debate email me! My biggest concerns are using the ontological(It tends to be confusing and takes a long period of time to explain) and the uniqueness of Christ(This is a very good way to set the stage for my last arguments, but it tends to take a long time).Also I will most likely not inclu8de the statments on Biblical reliability just for the sake of time. Also because Biblical reliability does not need to be established for the uniqueness argument and the resurrection argument. Eliminating this though, means I shouldn't Which arguments do you recommend?
P.S. The above arguments are the only special revelation and natural theological arguments I accept.(I didn't include arguments specifically aimed at poly/pantheism though. Nor arguments against unitarian conceptions of God such as the Islamic and Jewish conceptions of God, again for the sake of time.)
Wow I already see an Ad Hominem. Oh well! Byu the way...I am not arguing here!!!!!I'm merely asking your opinion on arguments I should and should not use.
More Ad Hominems. I'm really saddaned by the rediculous comments of "New Atheists". Bare Assertions are everywhere!