Muslims, why do you push for sharia law in Europe and the US?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cx329
  • Start date Start date
C

cx329

Guest
You come to our countries and sue because you're made to handle alcohol or pork at work or you firebomb publishers that publish books you find to be critical of islam. If you hate western culture so much, why don't you go live in a muslim country? You pigs are attempting to inject sharia law into our society. If you don't like the way we live go live in your own repressive counties.

This question will be deleted shortly. All anti-muslim rhetoric is promptly censored. We still value free speech in the developed world.
 
Get a grip you bigot

I havent noticed Muslims trying to push sharia law in the US and I work in a very heavily Muslim populated city!


uhhh Derp
I said the US
and its not ok to call people pigs just because you dont agree with their religion

I am aware of the issues that European nations and Canada have faced concerning Sharia law, however, the tone of this question is still over the top and downright rude!
 
Still, I think the cartoons now have a place in two separate narratives, one in Europe and one in the Middle East. In the words of the Somali-born Dutch politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the integration of Muslims into European societies has been sped up by 300 years due to the cartoons; perhaps we do not need to fight the battle for the Enlightenment all over again in Europe. The narrative in the Middle East is more complex, but that has very little to do with the cartoons.
 
Sorry, caradisney. You fail...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4749183.ece


Revealed: UK’s first official sharia courts
Abul Taher

ISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases.

The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.

Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.

Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims.

It has now emerged that sharia courts with these powers have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester with the network’s headquarters in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh.

Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi, whose Muslim Arbitration Tribunal runs the courts, said he had taken advantage of a clause in the Arbitration Act 1996.

Under the act, the sharia courts are classified as arbitration tribunals. The rulings of arbitration tribunals are binding in law, provided that both parties in the dispute agree to give it the power to rule on their case.

Siddiqi said: “We realised that under the Arbitration Act we can make rulings which can be enforced by county and high courts. The act allows disputes to be resolved using alternatives like tribunals. This method is called alternative dispute resolution, which for Muslims is what the sharia courts are.”

The disclosure that Muslim courts have legal powers in Britain comes seven months after Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, was pilloried for suggesting that the establishment of sharia in the future “seems unavoidable” in Britain.

In July, the head of the judiciary, the lord chief justice, Lord Phillips, further stoked controversy when he said that sharia could be used to settle marital and financial disputes.

In fact, Muslim tribunal courts started passing sharia judgments in August 2007. They have dealt with more than 100 cases that range from Muslim divorce and inheritance to nuisance neighbours.

It has also emerged that tribunal courts have settled six cases of domestic violence between married couples, working in tandem with the police investigations.

Siddiqi said he expected the courts to handle a greater number of “smaller” criminal cases in coming years as more Muslim clients approach them. “All we are doing is regulating community affairs in these cases,” said Siddiqi, chairman of the governing council of the tribunal.

Jewish Beth Din courts operate under the same provision in the Arbitration Act and resolve civil cases, ranging from divorce to business disputes. They have existed in Britain for more than 100 years, and previously operated under a precursor to the act.

Politicians and church leaders expressed concerns that this could mark the beginnings of a “parallel legal system” based on sharia for some British Muslims.

Dominic Grieve, the shadow home secretary, said: “If it is true that these tribunals are passing binding decisions in the areas of family and criminal law, I would like to know which courts are enforcing them because I would consider such action unlawful. British law is absolute and must remain so.”

Douglas Murray, the director of the Centre for Social Cohesion, said: “I think it’s appalling. I don’t think arbitration that is done by sharia should ever be endorsed or enforced by the British state.”

There are concerns that women who agree to go to tribunal courts are getting worse deals because Islamic law favours men.

Siddiqi said that in a recent inheritance dispute handled by the court in Nuneaton, the estate of a Midlands man was divided between three daughters and two sons.

The judges on the panel gave the sons twice as much as the daughters, in accordance with sharia. Had the family gone to a normal British court, the daughters would have got equal amounts.

In the six cases of domestic violence, Siddiqi said the judges ordered the husbands to take anger management classes and mentoring from community elders. There was no further punishment.

In each case, the women subsequently withdrew the complaints they had lodged with the police and the police stopped their investigations.

Siddiqi said that in the domestic violence cases, the advantage was that marriages were saved and couples given a second chance.

Inayat Bunglawala, assistant secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: “The MCB supports these tribunals. If the Jewish courts are allowed to flourish, so must the sharia ones.”
 
I think you are really dumb
don't you know the history?
don't you know about any of christian history?

I have only one question

who is invading Iraq?
who wants to invade Iran?
who is invading Palestine?
who came to us first?

it seems you don't know that the oil in the western countries come from middle east and Saudi Arabia especially,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatif

read about the economy, this is my city, and it supports you with 80000 barrels a day

WOW
who needs the other now?
you?or us?

we come to your lands because you are stealing every source and wealth from our lands

STUPID
 
It should be deleted. "You pigs..." is inappropriate and a violation of the guidelines.
 
I saw Photos of thousands of islamists in Europe saying things like "Europe is the cancer and Islam is the answer" my question is why don't these ppl return to their wonderful homelands and live with the religion of peace and leave the rest of theWorld alone! I am European with a multi cultural background and I am tired of it all - anyone have a problem with it get out and return to where you came from ....those who want to push their crap on others are the bigots not those who live in peace and get mentally phucked by stupid ignorant freaks..no Islam ...no sharia law ...not playing along .......PERIOD - I am European and USA is next!
 
World domination. Just watched Islam, Israel, and Armageddon. Everyone hates the Jews, and Islam will eventually try to force everyone to there religion. Our own books here in the US are telling lies about Islam and Christianity.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76936

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76671

Just My Thoughts!
 
Back
Top