Erm - well, yes, that is the issue, but this isn't the place to discuss it per se.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but I think those people who have posted on this thread so far are the ones who actually do regularly post and discuss their ideas - the main reason I've kept it open.
So...beginning the discussion on
THIS thread, I'm curious to know if people consider drug and alcohol (redundant, I know) addiction a true disability.
I do, but that's because they're a disease and manageable but not curable, which is essentially the definition of long-term disability.
So films with movies about addicts - recently
Blow,
Leaving Las Vegas,
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas,
Requiem for a Dream - would count.
Even more en pointe to my own life are films about mental disabilities, aside from down syndrome or those who are developmentally disabled (the most commonly portrayed mental disabilities). For example,
Niagra, Niagra and
As Good As It Gets, not to mention
Benny and Joon.
As for the latter two films, I loved the first but not so much the second...but I had problems with both. Jack Nicholson has gone on record to say he portrayed his character in
As Good As It Gets as angry and aggressive because that's how he'd feel if he had the disability.
However, he portrayed the aggression in such a way that it appeared to be a tick, like with Tourette's (a related disorder), not just an angry person. This led to people thinking those with OCD are commonly aggressive, which is not true, and generally very much the opposite. That really pissed me off. (for a more realistic, albeit TV version, of the disorder, watch USA Network's
Monk)
As for
Benny and Joon, what's-her-name combined multiple disorders in order to exaggerate the characterisitcs of her character. Again, I like everyone involved with the project but felt dissatisfied by the misrepresentation.
Anyone else have thoughts on this?
(How's that for discussion.

)