deep blue2
New member
Difficult to say what your class teacher wants without asking him/her directly, but I interpret this question as being all about motion so,
A) with a moving subject, subject is sharp, but background blurred - do this by panning the camera on the moving subject (I take it you've done this already) with a fairly high shutter speed;
B) still with moving things - this time the subject blurred but background sharp - this just means not panning the camera, but having a shutter speed slow enough to capture the motion blur (background will be sharp) ie you'll get the opposite result to that above;
C) I take this to mean a moving subject, but this time both the subject AND the background to be sharp. Do this with a faster shutter speed than A) - to enable BOTH to be sharp.
Results - both A) and B) will give a sense of motion in the image, but in C) the subject will appear to be stationary, as there's no blur to give the idea of motion.
A) with a moving subject, subject is sharp, but background blurred - do this by panning the camera on the moving subject (I take it you've done this already) with a fairly high shutter speed;
B) still with moving things - this time the subject blurred but background sharp - this just means not panning the camera, but having a shutter speed slow enough to capture the motion blur (background will be sharp) ie you'll get the opposite result to that above;
C) I take this to mean a moving subject, but this time both the subject AND the background to be sharp. Do this with a faster shutter speed than A) - to enable BOTH to be sharp.
Results - both A) and B) will give a sense of motion in the image, but in C) the subject will appear to be stationary, as there's no blur to give the idea of motion.