I
i.LovE.HoMeWorK...!!!
Guest
I have to argue a case in a moot, where my speech will revolve around the following law:
Section 274 - Defence of moveable property against trespassers
It is lawful for any person who is in peaceable possession of any moveable property, and for any person lawfully assisting him or her or acting by his or her authority, to use such force as is reasonably necessary in order to resist the taking of such property by a trespasser, or in order to retake it from a trespasser, provided that the person does not do grievous bodily harm to the trespasser.
A man was holding a laptop computer that he had been asked to retrieve by the owner, and was confronted by a trespasser. He pushed the man away, which caused him to step back, putting his foot through rotten wood and causing him to break his leg. I need to argue that the man with the laptop did not cause grievous bodily harm: HELP!!
Section 274 - Defence of moveable property against trespassers
It is lawful for any person who is in peaceable possession of any moveable property, and for any person lawfully assisting him or her or acting by his or her authority, to use such force as is reasonably necessary in order to resist the taking of such property by a trespasser, or in order to retake it from a trespasser, provided that the person does not do grievous bodily harm to the trespasser.
A man was holding a laptop computer that he had been asked to retrieve by the owner, and was confronted by a trespasser. He pushed the man away, which caused him to step back, putting his foot through rotten wood and causing him to break his leg. I need to argue that the man with the laptop did not cause grievous bodily harm: HELP!!