Lets do a really positive rant on TNA...?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sub Zero, Rated RKO~! - OS
  • Start date Start date
S

Sub Zero, Rated RKO~! - OS

Guest
Just write down all the POSITIVES you can come up with about TNA.
Whether that be the company, the roster or even the commentating team ... maybe not the last one but you get the idea


Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
they gave christian cage the push he deserved, other than that, i got nothing really

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
They have Sting, AJ Styles, Somoa Joe, XXX, Senshi, daniels, etc.
They have more talent then the wwe.
There ppvs have great wrestling in them
They have more postive attitudes there (company owner wise)
Less steroid users

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
destanation X match is entertaining
more talent from top to bottom
sting!!!! thats a big 1
less fake but still fake
can put crazier stuff on spike then usa or CW i mean watch raws when they were on spike like the edge & lita "party"
better high flyers
not owned by a cynical old man
hAvent had a owner fake death storyline
no roid scandal and less guys dying
better tag teams and womens divisions

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
It has a lot of new talent the WWE hasn't destroyed yet.
More wrestling and less lame storylines.
Better tag team division.
Now a better Women's division.
A unique ring.
Feels more like the old regional type wrestling I grew up with.
Fans seem to have more say in matches at times.

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
They have Sting, Angle, Cage, Somoa Joe, Judas Messias.
They put on better matches. (The gountlet match last week was great.)
They, too, have a two hour program.

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
good owner balanced commentary who don't hate each other (cough coucgh** cole and jbl)
atleast one extreme match each show
good matches
one show

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
TNA does have positives. Even though I speak about their negatives at times, it is really because I want them to get far and not fall down the toilet.
-They have the talent to get them over. Their wrestlers can pave the way for the next generation of wrestling with their abilities and overall skill
-Unlike the WWE, they have many of their light-heavyweights on their show and allow them to display their skills
-The wrestlers, both heavyweights and light-heavyweights, are more daring and willing to entertain the crowd
-TNA does try to be innovative and different with their gimmick matches
-Their leading talent is placed there for a reason: they are talented. Sting, Kurt Angle, Samoa Joe, Christian Cage, AJ Styles, and soon the new TNA "Knockouts" are all skilled.
**Their owner is not a character on the show


**starred**

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
they have good wrestlers like sabin and shelley.
christian really did deserve a push.
they r trying to make an actual womens division which hopefully will be good.
they try to have matches instead of stupid storylines and giving birth to hands.
they r getting better each month and seem to try to give wrestlers a chance even if i dont like them(i wont name names)
has some hardcore action and dont ban moves

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
Do I have to? I love to be mean but since it's not nice to be mean, I won't in this one. (J/K) ... Here are my TNA Positives:

1) They have one of the greatest workers in the business in "The Samoan Submission Machine" Samoa Joe. Alot of people look at him and think he can't wrestle (for those that first saw him and didn't know who he was). He is underrated.

2) While some people question TNA's latest acquisitions (being exWWE wrestlers), TNA has hired some great wrestlers such as Kurt Angle and Christian Cage. Both guys have name recognition from wrestling fans and it will likely help them get a boost in ratings in the future as more people channel flip and word gets out about TNAs' two hour timeslot (yes, there are still some people who don't know TNA is now a two hour show but then again, it's only been a week).

3) TNA has a decent talent pool to choose from to put on television. With a two hour show weekly, they don't need to worry about overexposure to their product. (TNA Xplosion airs in some markets but not many)

4) TNA gives television time to a few wrestlers some wrestling fans have never heard about, such as Robert Roode. It's nice to see TNA build up wrestlers by giving them television time.

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
Great Macthes
Good Storylines
better high flyers
doesnt have an old man running the business
doesnt have storylines involving death
Kurt Angle
Great PPVs
Now has 2 hours
On Spike tv
Pacman Jones (only good for media)
Good Supperstars get the right pushes (though some deserve better)
No Crappy Superstars in the main event

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
I can't think of any except that they are good at stealing WWE superstars

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
-Incredibly good young talent. Samoa Joe, AJ Styles, Alex Shelley, Senshi, Harris, Abyss, etc. All of them could be a cornerstone for the federation in a few years or even months down the road.
-Some of their older talent, if used right, can be good. Christian, Sting, even Angle, if used right, could be a huge asset.
-Far better women's division.
-The ability to work with guys from around the indies/Japan.
-Better potential tag team divsion, with XXX, MCMGs, LAX, etc.

Basically, everything positive about TNA is all about potential. They've got a huge upside, but it remains to be seen whether they'll make good on it.

Powered by Yahoo Answers
 
Back
Top