kill bill 2 (spoliers)

I

imxfamousx101

New member
just saw this and was just wondering..u know at the end where she is trapped in the coffin? is it actually possible to break through the wood like that ?
 
The coffin part isn't at the end..

And she learned that technique (Breaking through wood from such a short distance) during her training with that chinese guy with the long beard! He made her do it over and over again, made her wince through her pain, she couldn't even eat her rice properly! Remember!?
 
I think the OP is trying to say Is it possible. If you are still alive, weak from fighting/killing. You wake up to find yourself burried in a coffin, 10 foot under.

Would you be able to have the strength to get through it?

It's a long heavy way up. Only a Martial Arts Pro could answer that one.
 
Quentin Tarantino has the story for Vol. 3 which will see Nikki, daughter of Vernita Green (played by Vivica A Fox), seek out The Bride in 15 years.

Nikki will be raised by Sofie Fatale, who will have inherited all of Bill's money and hopefully bought herself two new arms (Yes she DID lose both, watch the Japanese version of Vol. 1 for proof)

However QT wants to use all the same actors for Vol. 3. Ambrosia Kelly (Nikki) Julie Dreyfus (Sofie) and Uma Thurman (The Bride) so he will wait until they've aged and hopes Julie and Uma wont give in to the botox craze along the way.
 
Have to say I thought part 2 was pretty dull by comparison. The worse bit was the end credits showing clips of Part 1 just to remind you how good that was compared to what you'd just sat through. :rolleyes:
 
Quentin Tarantino made one great film Pulp Fiction, he adapated a brilliant Elmore Leonard novel in Jackie Brown but Reservoir Dogs was better when it was called City On Fire and the dialogue in Kill Bill, something QT is supposed to be good at, was absolutely awful. Bill's Superman speech was dreadful and as it was written by QT, was more than likely stolen from somewhere else.
 
The dialogue in Kill Bill was purposefully bad [in parts] - it was dedicated to his love of 'Grindhouse' cinema --much like KB itself. The dialogue in KB2 was much more character-orientated --and therefore much more QT-like. The Superman monologue was the freakin' dogs-balls. QT readily admits to ripping films off - so what? He's the ultimate film-nerd who was talented enough to break [nah EXPLODE] into the industry himself. He's not ripping scenes off to be commercially successful... but because HE PROFOUNDLY LOVES the movies/scenes he's imitating and wants to portray his passion for these obscure flicks within his own. The fact that he does so with so much style, wit and genius dialogue is the reason nothing seems contrived or flat-out copied.
 
The dialogue was purposefully bad? That is the first time I have heard that about Kill Bill. To say it took him 6 years to write it, I would hate see what Inglorious BastarRAB is after he has spent 10 years on that.

Genius dialogue? Most of his most memorable lines came from something else. Do a little research on him. The statistics will shock you.
 
That was good, and coupled with Julie Dreyfus (Where has this new talent gone?) delivering it in Japanese in the background, it was a great moment in film
 
Back
Top