Isn't "The Bell Curve" faulty science that's designed to divide (and conquer)?

Duell Manifold

New member
In 1993 Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein authored a best-selling book, "The Bell Curve," that described and elaborated on longitudinal studies of human intelligence that showed racial differences in IQ.

However, although the data used seems sound, is it completely valid for determining human capacity to succeed in life? Are there other factors that were left out?

Finally, isn't the literary work an excuse for bigotry and discrimination against whole groups of people, based on faulty (incomplete) science?

(Not that that's necessarily what Murray and Herrnstein intended.)
 
Back
Top