Here is a noted climate skeptic engaging the scientific community in debate:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/jul/13/climate-sceptic-morano-award
Is this the way it should be done? Is what Morano does the same as a what a skeptic might claim, without proof, is being done to them?
Jim: I love the way you double down on these things.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/jul/13/climate-sceptic-morano-award
Is this the way it should be done? Is what Morano does the same as a what a skeptic might claim, without proof, is being done to them?
Jim: I love the way you double down on these things.