A
AnnunaElite2012
Guest
actually you are wrong because 18= 9 which is 3x3 and is a common number in arithmetic
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Frst Grade Rocks! Ω
New member
I see you're a 2012 aficionado.
(2)*(012) + (20)*(12) + (201)*(2) = 666
(2)*(012) + (20)*(12) + (201)*(2) = 666
V
Vincent G
Guest
No; it occurs about as often as 665 and 667.
L
Larry454
Guest
Now here is a classic explanation of the logic of superstition. "You are wrong because 18= 9 which is 3x3 and is a common number in arithmetic."
18 = 9? Am I getting this right? 3x3 is a common number? Like more common than 18? And 18 is connected to 666 by --what?
My eyes glaze over. What an insignificant substitute this is for rational thinking.
18 = 9? Am I getting this right? 3x3 is a common number? Like more common than 18? And 18 is connected to 666 by --what?
My eyes glaze over. What an insignificant substitute this is for rational thinking.
J
jethom33545
Guest
Not in any significant way. Are you trying to make some assertion? Is so,just come out with it.
D
David D
Guest
It occurs about once in every thousand enumerations
T
tina l
Guest
no.
any particular reason you ask?
any particular reason you ask?
S
spot a
Guest
No it is not common in astronomy.
It is the devil's number, the number of the beast, in the bible
It is the devil's number, the number of the beast, in the bible