Is Sarah Palin the most dangerous woman in history?

  • Thread starter Thread starter louis n
  • Start date Start date
L

louis n

Guest
Square jawed ex vietnam vet John Mccain is but a heart beat away from death, if he wins the election in November this leaves a creationist in charge of the most dangerous country in the world - Discuss
 
George Bush's administrations utter incompetency has gauranteed a landslide victory for the Democrats.

Sarah Palin is a footnote in history right below Geraldine Ferraro.
 
No, but Nancy Pelosi may be, and she's only TWO heartbeats away from the presidency, no matter WHO wins the election.
 
I personally do not see Palin as being an advantage for our Country, or McCain, on the contrary.

When someone claims to know the mind of God, all of my flags go up, no one knows the mind of God. let alone claims to. From listening to her conversations on television I do not see her as being equipped 'at all' for the position but only chosen to gain votes for McCain, seeings how she is female 'and' christian. Only being objective, not condemning....

It is so obvious to me, no offense to anyone at all. I have no prosperous feelings about either of them holding office.
 
You can't compare her to women in history when women are just starting to make history from this point of view. But I do see devil horns on her. Then again I see devil horns on ALL political figures. Poli=one tic=blood sucking insect.
 
On the "it takes one to know one" premise, I immediately spotted her as willing and capable of beginning World War III.

I'm voting "Palin"; I'm bored anyway.
 
Your deliver is very melodramatic.

Most dangerous woman ever? Not enough info to tell yet. Any President is pretty much an unknown quantity until the moment of crisis.

That said, as a fundamentalist christian I don't trust her any farther than I could throw her to protect the rights of non-christians. Sure, she is paying lip service now but if there is anything she is good at (and I'm not sure there is) it is at giving good sermons.
 
LOL! They used to say that about Hillary. 8^)

Between the both of them, I think Hillary is much more 'dangerous' because she knows what she's doing. Sarah Palin is like GW Bush. She doesn't have any real political thinking of her own, instead she chants the slogans Republican voters want to hear.

If (God forbid!) McCain won and then tipped over, making Palin president, she would be just about exactly the same president McCain would have been. The same president Bush is. Because the McCain/Palin administration, and later the Palin administration, would have the exact same policy and decision makers as the Bush administration. If the Republicans win, it doesn't really matter -who- is president because the president is really just a spokesman for a group of party powerful who really run the administration, and why would you expect that to be different under McCain or Palin than it is now?

Hillary, if she became president, would actually have plans, an agenda of her own. She'd have to fight not just the Republicans but her own party. She would bring worthy political skills and savvy to bear. Palin couldn't do that. She wouldn't know how she felt about things without party hacks to advise her and brief her.
 
Back
Top