Is it time to re-frame the global warming debate and the need for emissions reduction?

R

Ron R

New member
Suppose, instead of debating whether or not global warming is real, we look at emissions reduction, emission free technology and reforestation as methods of increasing the amount of breathable air?

While scientists can use statistics to prove or disprove almost anything, I do not believe that any scientist can mount a case for the reduction of breathable air.
Evidently some of you missed the "almost" in the phrase "prove or disprove ALMOST anything
 
<<While scientists can use statistics to prove or disprove almost anything,>>

So do you think scientists can prove that driving drunk reduces traffic accidents?

Perhaps you should think about the things you say before you say them.

<<I do not believe that any scientist can mount a case for the reduction of breathable air.>>

After saying scientists can prove anything, you tell me there are things they cannot prove.
 
Back
Top