At least
elaborate on that post (irrefutable facts would help as opposed to vague hints), otherwise you just look like a paranoid conspiracy nutjob, no offense.
You may call it "naivety", but sometimes a story is just a story, and a film is just a film. 'Inception' is no different, and Nolan himself admits that the film is merely based on a cool idea he had whilst dreaming. As a film studies student, i actually find it irritating when people try and convince me that a film has extremely obscure hidden meanings beyond what the writer/director intended (i remember one of my uni lecturers trying to convince us of the very thin theory that just because the two main characters in the film 'Double Indemnity' frequently lit each others ciggarettes, this meant that they were secretly homosexual

). A popular director/writer who was accused of having deeper meanings in some of his films once said something along the lines of "i filmed/wrote it that way because it looked good and entertaining, not because it had any subversive political meanings" (i forget who it was that actually said that, but i definitely remember seeing the documentary extract).
Obviously i agree that
some films do indeed have these subversive themes that are there for the viewer to find (hell, even Avatar was critiquing the Iraq conflict), but most of the time a film is just designed to be entertaining and original.
I've had odd sci-fi screenplay ideas before, but it doesn't mean that i'm privy to some futuristic technological concept that NASA is withholding from the public for the next 50 years..