If this is true about climate change ,why do they keep on charging us green tax?

[Mr happy]

Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.
The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.

Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.

He also agreed that there had been two periods which experienced similar warming, from 1910 to 1940 and from 1975 to 1998, but said these could be explained by natural phenomena whereas more recent warming could not.

 

[Jonathan]

I do not know if global warming is happening but I find the scientists who claim it is more convincing but what seems to me important is that we should stop be wasteful with energy (efficiency is a good thing), it's probably a bad thing to poison the land with too many chemicals (though we probably benefit from a few) and the oil burning motor car is generally a bad thing (smelly, noisy, kills people and there are too many).

The green agenda is based on the pre-cautionary principle, which I generally view as a poor strategy but many of the measures they suggest appear to me fairly painless and sensible.