If the US falls, will the Native American genocide be recognized as an

L

liberalssuckass10

New member
i want to know why it is that nothing is said about using wmd's against the native americans. using a gatling gun and repeating firearms against a stone arrowhead or spear point is in effect, using a weapon of mass destruction
 
I'm sorry to hear it's not much mentioned in history books.

But your analogy is flawed. The German genocide immediately preceded its loosing it's war. Our genocide was not committed by any living person, but by people who lived more than a century ago.

Germany did not "fall" in the sense of being utterly destroyed.
 
I taught history in a public school for 8 years and every year we discussed the horrible treatment of the Native Americans in great detail.
 
not to the extent one would think, but the way we treated indigenous american indians will be/has always been down played, much like the way we treated japanese americans during WWII.
 
i want to know why it is that nothing is said about using wmd's against the native americans. using a gatling gun and repeating firearms against a stone arrowhead or spear point is in effect, using a weapon of mass destruction
 
integral part of America history? Right now it is not mentioned in the history books much but like Germany when they fell their acts of genocide had become a some what center piece of their history. I wonder if the US falls will the Native American genocide be recognized as a center piece of our history and dominance for the centuries that came. Of course this is a hypothetical question because the world will end in a massive nuclear war in the US ever did fail but you get what I'm trying to get at...
 
First off, the "Native Americans" are as native to this country as the descendants of colonial Europeans. It is a proven historical fact that the Indian tribes migrated from Siberia to North America via the Trans-Siberian Land Bridge that allowed people to walk from modern day Russian to modern day Alaska. Besides, the term "native" means "native-born", which means you were born in that country.

In that sense, I am a native-born American. You are likely a native-born American. There are hundreds of millions of native-born Americans.

Furthermore, the American Indians themselves are guilty of a genocide. When they immigrated, this continent was occupied by another culture which no longer exists, although human skeletons pre-dating even the oldest American Indian skeleton have been found - the newest of which shares a similar carbon dating to the oldest American Indian skeleton.

Of course, you never here about THAT genocide in school. It's not politically correct to show that the "victimized" American Indians also have a genocidal history.
 
First off, the "Native Americans" are as native to this country as the descendants of colonial Europeans. It is a proven historical fact that the Indian tribes migrated from Siberia to North America via the Trans-Siberian Land Bridge that allowed people to walk from modern day Russian to modern day Alaska. Besides, the term "native" means "native-born", which means you were born in that country.

In that sense, I am a native-born American. You are likely a native-born American. There are hundreds of millions of native-born Americans.

Furthermore, the American Indians themselves are guilty of a genocide. When they immigrated, this continent was occupied by another culture which no longer exists, although human skeletons pre-dating even the oldest American Indian skeleton have been found - the newest of which shares a similar carbon dating to the oldest American Indian skeleton.

Of course, you never here about THAT genocide in school. It's not politically correct to show that the "victimized" American Indians also have a genocidal history.
 
Back
Top