...evidence? Such as: Piltdown man, nebraska man, haeckel's embryos, the proposed "dino bird", coelcanth, lucy, even though people still accept her as a hominid. Also the "biological big bang" makes no evolutionary sense. How is batesian mimicry evolution if its all random mutations. The butterflies cant look at other butterflies and say "oh, nobody eats him i think im going to change myself."
Coelcanth was a fish ready to grow limbs because of bones in it fins, thought to have evolved millions of years ago, until they found populations off coasts in Indonesia and S. Africa. Haeckels drawings were nothing less than a gross misinterpretation.The differences vastly outweigh the similarities. A snake looks a bit like a worm, but that has nothing to do with where it came from or common ancestry. Is anyone going to answer how batesian mimicry is evolution, its going to be quite hard since it defies evolution. My biology teacher even said it was a good example of evolution.
Coelcanth was a fish ready to grow limbs because of bones in it fins, thought to have evolved millions of years ago, until they found populations off coasts in Indonesia and S. Africa. Haeckels drawings were nothing less than a gross misinterpretation.The differences vastly outweigh the similarities. A snake looks a bit like a worm, but that has nothing to do with where it came from or common ancestry. Is anyone going to answer how batesian mimicry is evolution, its going to be quite hard since it defies evolution. My biology teacher even said it was a good example of evolution.