Well, let's see.... at the time the Northern Democrats (lead by the pro-slavery/ pro-appeasement Copperheads) were complaining that Abe Lincoln had
A) Gotten us into a war under false premises
B) Raped and plundered the Constitution of the United States by installing a draft and suspending Habeas Corpus
C) Had spent too much money on a war against a non-agressive foe
D) Had lost too many American lives in a quagmire of a war
E) Couldn't speak proper English and was an inexperienced "boob" of a politician
F) Was a hick from a western state with no political sophistication
Sounds like he was the first GW Bush, to me. If he were debating Iraq on Friday, he'd probaly say freedom is always worth fighting for, whether it was freedom for 7 million African Americans in Slavery or 35 Million Iraqis.. but most importantly, the war must be WON, and must be fought to victory otherwise it only encourages the forces of oppression. The bailout is an exceptional act for an exceptional crisis... above all, it MUST NOT be used as a precedent for further Government involvement in the market in case of future, less drastic events.
Whoever invoked the Louisiana Purchase - that took place in April 1803, almost 60 years before Lincoln... so I'm not sure the parallel. It was purchased for 15,000,000 by Jefferson (after interest, it was a little more than 23,000,000 dollars- which would be $313,978,488.04 in today's money)
2 Billion in 1865 equals $26,798,826,595 in 2007