I
I disagree!
Guest
have some issues? As the light gathering power of the telescope is small I need to prolong the exposure time (the high ISO deteriorates too much the quality) but that is a problem in my case.I ask what will happen if I shoot at 1 or 3 megapixels instead of 7 megapixels?In my perspective more sensor dots will generate a single image pixel and thus more light per pixel?
I know this sounds logical but I feel it's wrong.
By the way I know you are not supposed to answer other things but I have some questions about my camera - it has settings for sharp/smooth edges and high resolution.What's the advantage of using medium resolution at 7 megapixel and high resolution at 3 megapixel?
I always select the sharp edges setting.In the booklet it is adviced for shooting buildings only.
There is also some gain like level,it goes slightly below and above zero and it's measured in eV if I remember correct,but it seems not to be dealing with light sensitivity.The explanation in the booklet is complex referring to different combinations of brightness of the object and background
I know this sounds logical but I feel it's wrong.
By the way I know you are not supposed to answer other things but I have some questions about my camera - it has settings for sharp/smooth edges and high resolution.What's the advantage of using medium resolution at 7 megapixel and high resolution at 3 megapixel?
I always select the sharp edges setting.In the booklet it is adviced for shooting buildings only.
There is also some gain like level,it goes slightly below and above zero and it's measured in eV if I remember correct,but it seems not to be dealing with light sensitivity.The explanation in the booklet is complex referring to different combinations of brightness of the object and background