I think the worst royal rumble in history is the 2009 royal rumble because orton...

P

Paco

New member
...won,who agrees with me? I mean what im trying to say is that usually heel guys dont win the royal rumble and that guy randy orton did alot of bad things he kicked mr.mcmahon in the head a week before the rumble plus he still goes on and wins the royal rumble, to me, a face guy should always win it because its looks cool and the end when they also win the championship at wrestlemania and helps them prove who they really are like rey mysterio prove that at 2006 but like i say that was the worst rumble in history i think the only thing i liked about the 2009 royal rumble is that rvd made his return and would of love to see him won it but o well just hope randy orton loses the title soon
 
Yeah your great "hey lets have a face win the royal every year" GOD! Its nice to have things mixed up and changed now and then, And orton kicking that jerk mcMahon in the head was one of the greatest things on raw EVER (news flash he is a jerk in real life too). GO PUT YOUR CENA PAJAMAS ON.
 
ummm.....NO!!!! Randy Orton is the man. Him winning the does prove who he really is....a tough a** sumb****. he kicked all the boss in the head and won the rumble. he kicked all the mcmahons and went to wrestlemania. he took on the mcmahons and batista and won the title. unless taker or hbk had won the rumble and made their match a title match at Wm i dont think anyone else could have been a better choice
 
Okay, okay we know wrestling's scripted but it loses it's appeal if it doesn't seem (for lack of a better term) "realistic." In real life the good guy doesn't always win. Plus if we knew that a fan favorite was going to win the Royal Rumble every year it would not only be monotonous but it would be predictable, boring and a lot of people would choose not to watch it.

Part of wrestling's appeal is wondering who's going to win. If you take that out of wrestling it loses a lot of flavor.
 
Back
Top