I'm a year 9 student and I've been very curious if the drastic climate change was caused by man.
I've been very miss lead about Gore's speech during my geography class and we have to do a whole assignment on climate change, but the whole speech went on and off the topic, which I found very odd.
I think Gore will also become the very first carbon trading billionaire; and carbon trading doesn't seem to be helping the environment in anyway.
I also think that the government is earning millions and millions of dollars by making people worried about global warming; therefore make them buy water tanks, solar panels, etc.
It also seems to be that one side of the scientists are picking out bits of information that is not yet proven to be an actual fact.
For example, the scientists stated the ice caps in India were going to melt into water in 30 years.
They got the information from an Indian man, who has never even researched about the caps melting.
But on the other hand, we hardly hear from the other side of the scientists who think differently.
Still, it turned out that over 50% of US citizens have voted that they believe that the climate change was not all completely caused by man.
And if they WERE really worried about this, then instead of carbon trading, why not charge the large with a hefty price for factories polluting badly who are continuously being allowed more because they buy the emissions of the smaller companies (because it will eventually make them change the factories to make it greener), and not let the smaller factories or companies sell them their emissions?
Of course, I know it's not that easy, and I'm not trying to say that there is no such thing as global warming, and we, as humans aren't doing anything harmful by polluting toxins into the air.
But there has been climate change and there always will be.
Just because a few degrees has not been normal, it doesn't mean we should go and blame it all on humans.
After all, someone here is earning millions, soon to be billions of dollars.
So is it real or not?
I've been very miss lead about Gore's speech during my geography class and we have to do a whole assignment on climate change, but the whole speech went on and off the topic, which I found very odd.
I think Gore will also become the very first carbon trading billionaire; and carbon trading doesn't seem to be helping the environment in anyway.
I also think that the government is earning millions and millions of dollars by making people worried about global warming; therefore make them buy water tanks, solar panels, etc.
It also seems to be that one side of the scientists are picking out bits of information that is not yet proven to be an actual fact.
For example, the scientists stated the ice caps in India were going to melt into water in 30 years.
They got the information from an Indian man, who has never even researched about the caps melting.
But on the other hand, we hardly hear from the other side of the scientists who think differently.
Still, it turned out that over 50% of US citizens have voted that they believe that the climate change was not all completely caused by man.
And if they WERE really worried about this, then instead of carbon trading, why not charge the large with a hefty price for factories polluting badly who are continuously being allowed more because they buy the emissions of the smaller companies (because it will eventually make them change the factories to make it greener), and not let the smaller factories or companies sell them their emissions?
Of course, I know it's not that easy, and I'm not trying to say that there is no such thing as global warming, and we, as humans aren't doing anything harmful by polluting toxins into the air.
But there has been climate change and there always will be.
Just because a few degrees has not been normal, it doesn't mean we should go and blame it all on humans.
After all, someone here is earning millions, soon to be billions of dollars.
So is it real or not?