hey, im currently having a bit fo trouble with this. I have two topics, causes of WW2 and bodlyine bowling. For both topics, I am arguing a point of view and have historians quotes that support them.
What I am confused about however, is how do i inegrate the historians quote/POV to the thesis. One example is WW2 if i say thec auses is because of the appeasement and a historian illustrates this in their quote, how do i relate it? what would be the best way:
1. rarr (historian) supports this statement through his quote: ....
2. This statement is supported through the quote : ...
3. THis statemet is evident in the hisotrians rarr's quote: ...
sorry bout the confusion, but im really confused. How do you think its best to relate historiography to main points in essays? whats the words or statemnt that links the two together
thanks in adance
What I am confused about however, is how do i inegrate the historians quote/POV to the thesis. One example is WW2 if i say thec auses is because of the appeasement and a historian illustrates this in their quote, how do i relate it? what would be the best way:
1. rarr (historian) supports this statement through his quote: ....
2. This statement is supported through the quote : ...
3. THis statemet is evident in the hisotrians rarr's quote: ...
sorry bout the confusion, but im really confused. How do you think its best to relate historiography to main points in essays? whats the words or statemnt that links the two together
thanks in adance