J
John D
Guest
How is it justified to force America to buy foreign purchases of oil to send them over thousands of miles of oceans to save some barren places in an an unpopulated (man or animal) area, as well as any other areas in America?
Environmentalists have cornered America to bankrupt itself by restricting our own development of oil by claiming that we need to save our environment, while hypocritically supporting that (if oil destroys environments) we send oil in an even higher risk of transportation - shipping in supertankers over the fragile seas. On top of that, our government environmental regulations (and fuel taxes) have created such a burden on Americans, that we cannot afford to support investment into new fuel ideas.
Fuel runs the world, and now we see that China intends to hurt America by purchasing greater amounts of oil than they can use, thereby forcing our costs even higher.
Is it worth it to lose savings, food, jobs and homes? Why? No other major country has to - why us?
Environmentalists have cornered America to bankrupt itself by restricting our own development of oil by claiming that we need to save our environment, while hypocritically supporting that (if oil destroys environments) we send oil in an even higher risk of transportation - shipping in supertankers over the fragile seas. On top of that, our government environmental regulations (and fuel taxes) have created such a burden on Americans, that we cannot afford to support investment into new fuel ideas.
Fuel runs the world, and now we see that China intends to hurt America by purchasing greater amounts of oil than they can use, thereby forcing our costs even higher.
Is it worth it to lose savings, food, jobs and homes? Why? No other major country has to - why us?